Tuesday, 6 January 2026

Political beggar Bersatu and Taliban-like PAS are stuck together despite backstabbings

Share to help stimulate good governance, ensure future of people & M’sia

No News Is Bad News

Political beggar Bersatu and Taliban-like PAS are stuck together despite backstabbings

KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 6, 2026: International political news website Finance Twitter has posted a damning article on the Bersatu-PAS political relationship.

It opines that the racist Bersatu, led by the unpatriotic Muhyiddin “I Am Malay First” Yassin, and the Taliban-like PAS, will continue backstabbing each other because of mistrust but are likely unable to go separate ways because both also dislike and distrust the racial and religious bigoted Umno, now only the third largest Malay party with only 26 seats in the 222-seat Parliament.

No News Is Bad News reproduces below the Finance Twitter’s political news analysis:

News

Traitors Turn On Traitors: Why PAS & Bersatu Backstab, Betray Each Other

6 January, 2026

 

According to Finance Twitter , PAS backstabs PAS for projects. Bersatu betrays PAS for power. PAS calls Bersatu traitor and kicks three of its own kind out for going rogue. Bersatu refuses PAS’ demand to also sack five of its own kind. PAS weaponizes Islam, claiming people who demand positions cannot be given one. Bersatu pretends it didn’t know about any treachery, but seizes power anyway.

Perlis may be Malaysia’s smallest state, but its latest crisis could be the biggest – even the deadliest – to hit opposition Perikatan Nasional coalition consisting of right-wing and far-right political parties. Crucially, both Islamist party PAS and nationalist party Bersatu not only 100% completely dominate the alliance, but also comprise 100% Malay-Muslim lawmakers.

Racist bigot Bersatu and religious extremist PAS can continue blaming each other till kingdom comes over the Perlis political crisis, but they definitely cannot blame the Chinese or Democratic Action Party (DAP)– their favourite punching bag – this round. At best, it was caused by traitor Bersatu betraying traitor PAS. At worst, it was caused by something called “KARMA”.

Yes, Malaysian Islamic Party (PAS –Parti Islam Se-Malaysia) should not cry, whine, moan and bitch about Bersatu’s treachery. After all, this is not the first day PAS knew that its buddy was a traitor. Bersatu president Muhyiddin Yassin became the 8th Prime Minister after he betrayed his own allies and friends in 2020, leading to the collapse of the democratically-elected Pakatan Harapan government.

PAS should also stop being a hypocrite, pretending that it had been viciously betrayed when in fact the Islamist party was the same despicable traitor who colluded with Bersatu in a coup that overthrew the legitimate multiracial government back in 2020 to form a backdoor regime. Like a leopard which never changes its spots, it’s Bersatu’s nature to backstab and betray friends for power, regardless of race and religion.

The only difference is Muhyiddin betrayed Pakatan Harapan in 2020, and betrayed Perikatan Nasional in 2025. And chances are Bersatu will continue to backstab and betray any new friends in the future just for the sake of power and position. It’s not personal, but purely business. There are no permanent friends or permanent enemies in politics, only permanent interests.

There’s nothing extraordinary about backstabbing, betrayal, and blaming game in Perlis. Get your popcorn because it is not the end of domestic violence between PAS and Bersatu, where both keep slapping, backstabbing and kicking each other but refuse to divorce. At the end, Bersatu president Muhyiddin was forced to resign as Perikatan Nasional chairman after pressure from PAS.

In Perlis, its State Legislative Assembly consists of 15 seats – nine held by PAS, five by Bersatu and one by PKR. The crisis exploded when 3 PAS assemblymen along with 5 Bersatu assemblymen openly stated that they no longer supported the Menteri Besar Mohd Shukri Ramli. The stunning withdrawal of support means the chief minister must resign.

The crisis was so unexpected that the chief minister suffered a “heart attack” and had to be hospitalized. But the drama also shocked PAS supremo Abdul Hadi Awang. The PAS president was so angry he had personally announced the immediate termination of the three Perlis assemblymen – Saad Seman (Chuping), Fakhrul Anwar Ismail (Bintong) and Mohd Ridzuan Hashim (Guar Sanji).

However, it was a dumb and reckless move by Hadi. By cutting off nose to spite face, PAS is now left with only 6 assemblymen, unable to form a simple majority state government after Perlis assembly speaker Rus’sele Eizan retracted a request that the Election Commission holds by-elections for the three seats. In turn, Bersatu’s Abu Bakar Hamzah swiftly sworn in as new CEO of Perlis, costing PAS one of its prized chief minister posts.

Exactly why was Hadi so pissed off? That’s because (former) Menteri Besar Mohd Shukri Ramli is related to him – relatives by marriage. Get real, the five Bersatu assemblymen would not dare go rogue – poking holes in the roof of PAS – without the “green light” from the big boss – Muhyiddin. Clearly the coup was a slap in the face of Hadi Awang. In fact, it was a “declaration of war” from Muhyiddin.

If a state where Perikatan Nasional controls 14 out of 15 seats could collapse out of the blue, it speaks volumes about the devastating bad blood between PAS and Bersatu. You don’t need a rocket scientist to tell that both parties no longer trust each other and have to split. However, the question is how to split because neither Hadi nor Muhyiddin wants to be seen as the bad guy who presses the nuclear button.

Hardy boy wants Bersatu to exit Perikatan Nasional voluntarily so that the Islamist party has an excuse to re-activate Muafakat Nasional and work with previous partner UMNO. On the other hand, Muhyiddin provokes PAS to kick Bersatu out so that Bersatu can play the victim card and fall back on Ikatan Prihatin Rakyat (IPR) – a loose coalition formed by 11 parties founded by Muhyiddin. So, both PAS and Bersatu have their respective backup plan.

Of course, the Islamist party can silently abandon Perikatan Nasional and restarts the engine of previously hatched national cooperation between UMNO and PAS, glorified as “Muafakat Nasional” under the pretext of Malay-unity. However, if PAS abandons Perikatan Nasional, PAS would be accused of not only power-crazy, but also betrayal to friendship and Muslim brotherhood.

PAS is somehow trapped – it can’t boot Bersatu or quit Perikatan Nasional to join UMNO in Muafakat Nasional. That’s why Muhyiddin deliberately sparked a crisis in Perlis, knowing it would anger PAS leaders, who – as expected – have condemned Bersatu of betrayal and backstabbing. Under so-called pressure, Muhyiddin tactically resigned on Dec 30, 2025 as Perikatan Nasional chairman, effective January 1, 2026.

Thanking supporters without naming a successor or satisfactorily explaining the move, Muhyiddin’s resignation has raised eyebrows as well as causing other Bersatu leaders loyal to him to step down from leadership posts in the coalition. However, Muhyiddin still remains as Bersatu president. This partial retreat appears calculated, most likely planned for months (after consultation with wife). 

In truth, Malaysian Islamic Party (PAS –Parti Islam Se-Malaysia), Perikatan Nasional’s dominant partner, has been pushing for influence ever since Muhyiddin and Hadi do not see eye-to-eye for months. With Muhyiddin’s resignation, PAS could choose either one of its own leaders or Bersatu deputy president Hamzah Zainudin as the next Perikatan chairman.

Hamzah, openly backed by PAS leadership, may also be a potential challenge to Muhyiddin’s Bersatu presidency. But as cunning Muhyiddin predicted, power-hungry Hadi swallows the mouth-watering chairman post, confirming that PAS will take charge. This essentially strengthens Muhyiddin’s power in Bersatu as Hamzah’s ambition to become Perikatan poster boy is greatly reduced.

Surrendering Perikatan Nasional chairmanship in exchange for Perlis Chief Ministership and containing Hamzah’s rebellion is arguably a good bargain. Muhyiddin can also wash his hands clean, as the burden of leading Perikatan Nasional to winning the next 16th General Election is now shifted to religious extremist PAS. Good luck winning Sabah and Sarawak’s support, let alone non-Malay votes.

Muhyiddin’s selling point or value proposition, despite his “First Malay” political remark, is that he is lesser of two evils compared to PAS radical leaders. For that reason, the Borneo states could work with Bersatu – as seen during Muhyiddin’s backdoor Perikatan Nasional government from March 2020 to November 2022 – but certainly not Taliban PAS as the prime force in the country’s top leadership.

Worse, PAS can’t run a state, let alone a country. For almost 40 years, Kelantan, a state that PAS has been administering since 1990, remains one of the poorest states with no access to clean water. When PAS finally became part of Muhyiddin’s backdoor government in 2020, its deputy president, Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man, said the people of Kelantan would have to wait for another 40 years before any clean water supply can be provided to them.

Therefore, the presence of Bersatu in Perikatan Nasional actually dilutes the extremist image of PAS to project a moderate Malay-Muslim coalition. Additionally, Muhyiddin’s past experience in the previous ruling government of Barisan Nasional gives an assurance to the Malay supporters that Perikatan Nasional can actually run the country. On its own, PAS is like the Taliban running Afghanistan.

Still, Hamzah might be PAS’s last minute or desperate choice as prime ministerial candidate in an effort to hoodwink some Malays, Sabah and Sarawak, and minority Chinese and Indian ethnics that Perikatan Nasional under PAS isn’t Taliban. But that would put unnecessary pressure on Hadi’s leadership among PAS members, questioning why PAS cannot choose its own leaders as the 11th Prime Minister.

Crucially, if Hamzah or Hadi’s favourite choice – Terengganu Menteri Besar Ahmad Samsuri Mokhtar – becomes a prime ministerial candidate, then Muafakat Nasional is dead as UMNO does not see any incentive to join PAS. And if UMNO does not join forces with PAS, it means Bersatu remains alive and not isolated – continue riding on PAS machinery and grassroots in the next 16th General Election.

PAS has to choose either Bersatu or UMNO, not both, because UMNO hates Bersatu more than DAP Chinese. So, either PAS remains in Perikatan Nasional or jumps over to Muafakat Nasional. And if PAS decides to work with UMNO, it means Muhyiddin can reappoint himself as chairman of Perikatan Nasional again. Muhyiddin was basically taking a step back to move forward.

But why did Muhyiddin make the move now after three years? That’s because PAS and UMNO have in principle agreed behind closed doors to revive their cooperation. The agreement reached included UMNO president Zahid Hamidi as the Prime Minister, Muhyiddin must join Najib in prison for corruption, and Bersatu or Malaysian United Indigenous Party must be “neutralized”.

In the same breath, DAP lawmaker Yeo Bee Yin’s statement of celebration over former PM Najib Razak’s failed house arrest bid, and her refusal to apologize thereafter, was not the real reason why notorious UMNO Youth Chief Akmal Saleh instigating for the party to quit the Madani pact and revive Muafakat. Yeo was just a convenient tool for UMNO to extract concessions from both Madani and PAS.

The day Akmal started his attacks on KK Mart over a pair of socks in March 2024, followed by high-heeled shoes and ham sandwiches was the day UMNO and PAS have begun talks to revive Muafakat Nasional. And before Yeo’s outburst, something happened which made UMNO unconvinced that Anwar’s PKR could win the next election, leading to a more serious consideration of working with PAS – results of Sabah state election.

However, not everyone in PAS agrees to working with UMNO, the same way not every UMNO top leader agrees PAS can be trusted. There are factions in PAS who prefer working with Bersatu, whilst there are factions in UMNO who prefer sticking with Pakatan Harapan. Unlike in 2018, UMNO is already in the government and can take its own sweet time to consider all options.

In reality, the bad blood between Bersatu and PAS did not happen overnight. It actually started since the November 2022 General Election, which produced a hung parliament. Despite the enactment of the antihopping law, Muhyiddin arrogantly disregarded the law and breached the Federal Constitution and went on a shopping spree to buy elected lawmakers.

Yes, after the November 2022 national polls, Muhyiddin-led Perikatan Nasional had a chance to return to power. However, his arrogance – flatly rejecting a “Unity Government” proposed by then-King Sultan Abdullah – saw the opportunity crushed as he insisted on becoming the prime minister, and not the deputy to rival Pakatan Harapan leader Anwar Ibrahim.

Islamist party PAS president Hadi Awang was equally dumb, arrogant and overconfident that Perikatan Nasional could become the government – misled and hoodwinked by Muhyiddin’s claim that they had 115 SDs (statutory declarations) of support. Both Muhyiddin and Hadi were clueless that with the implementation of the anti-hopping law, those SDs were not worth the paper it’s written on.

Former PM Muhyiddin was furiously mad after the King rejected his dubious 115 SDs, but it was too late to cry over spilt milk. Barisan Nasional, despite suffering its worst defeat in history, has suddenly become the kingmaker. Without its 30 MPs, neither Pakatan Harapan (82 MPs) nor Perikatan Nasional (74 MPs) could form a government. It was game over after Barisan chose Pakatan over Perikatan.

Since then, Muhyiddin has been consistently blamed by PAS for navigating Perikatan to the opposition camp. The second chance to overthrow Anwar government in the six-state election in August 2023 also failed as the “green wave” lost its heat and kinetic energy. That was the last straw that broke the camel’s back, increasing pressure even within Bersatu for an expired product called Muhyiddin to retire.

To be fair, the Perlis coup was partly caused by PAS top leadership, who greedily grabbed all the four states (Kelantan, Terengganu, Kedah and Perlis) without willingness to share the “spoils of war”. Without a power base and having its accounts frozen due to corruption and money laundering allegations, Bersatu appears directionless and in a situation that is worse than a beggar.

Source : Finance Twitter

Monday, 5 January 2026

Can Warisan turn the tables on Umno to consolidate Sabah For Sabahans on Jan 24?

Share to help stimulate good governance, ensure future of people & M’sia

No News Is Bad News

vs 

Can Warisan turn the tables on Umno to consolidate Sabah For Sabahans on Jan 24?

KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 5, 2026: Now that Warisan has confirmed contesting both the Kinabatangan and Lamag by election, Sabahans have the opportunity to strengthen its resolve and commitment to their political battle cry - Sabah For Sabahans.

In the 17th Sabah Elections, Sabahans voted for locals from Warisan and Gagasan Rakyat.

However, Gagasan Rakyat/PGRS have already demonstrated that they are pro-Persekutuan (Federal Government) in managing the state.

PGRS is just a Persekutuan’s political puppet/lackeys.

 

And, both the parliamentary (Kinabatangan) and state (Lamag ) seats will be contested by candidates from the racial and religious bigoted Umno.

Need we say more about Umno’s political agenda and commitment to the welfare and interests of Sabahans?

On Jan 24, Sabahans in Kinabatngan and Lamag will go to the polls again to elect their MP and assemblyman who are truly committed to Sabah For Sabahans.

No News Is Bad News reproduces below a news report on Warisan’s confirmation to take on Umno in Kianbatangan and Lamag, a our previous posts:

Warisan confirms contesting Kinabatangan, Lamag by-elections

FMT Reporters

Deputy president Darell Leiking says the decision to contest the two seats should not be perceived as a sign of disrespect for the late Bung Moktar Radin.

Warisan has named ex-Sukau assemblyman Saddi Abdul Rahman as its candidate for the Kinabatangan parliamentary seat and Mazliwati Abdul Malik Chua for the Lamag state seat.

PETALING JAYA: Warisan has confirmed that it will contest the Kinabatangan and Lamag by-elections, with former Sukau assemblyman Saddi Abdul Rahman as its candidate for the parliamentary seat.

According to Malaysiakini, the party also named Mazliwati Abdul Malik Chua to contest the Lamag state seat.

Warisan deputy president Darell Leiking was quoted as saying that the decision to contest the two seats should not be perceived as a sign of disrespect for the late Bung Moktar Radin.

“The decision for Warisan to contest is not a denial of the contributions and service of the late representative, and certainly not a form of disrespect to him or his family,” he said when announcing the candidates at an event in Kinabatangan today.

Leiking said the decision instead stemmed from the belief that the people’s mandate must be upheld, and that the responsibility of representation can only be exercised through a legitimate and constitutional process.

Mazliwati contested the Kinabatangan seat in the 2022 general election, but lost to Bung who won with a 4,330 vote-majority. Mazliwati garnered a total of 12,512 votes.

Saddi won the Sukau seat in the 2008 general election and held it for three consecutive terms. In the 2020 state election, he contested the seat as an independent candidate and lost to Barisan Nasional’s (BN) Jaffry Ariffin.

Sabah BN has announced Ismail Ayob as its candidate for Lamag, while the Kinabatangan seat will be contested by Bung’s son, Naim Kurniawan.

The two seats were left vacant following Bung’s death on Dec 5.

Polling for both by-elections will take place on Jan 24, with nomination day and early voting scheduled for Jan 10 and Jan 20, respectively.

Monday, 15 December 2025

Jan 24: Chance for Sabahans to send a clear message to UG - repent, reform or pack-up in GE16

Share to help stimulate good governance, ensure future of people & M’sia

No News Is Bad News

Jan 24: Chance for Sabahans to send a clear message to UG - repent, reform or pack-up in GE16

KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 16, 2025: On Jan 24, Sabahans go to the polls again for the Kinabatangan and Lamag by-election, and both seats are expected to be contested and defended by the racial and religious bigoted Umno youth chief Dr Akmal "Dr Ham/I Am Malay First" Saleh's Umno.

It is a chance for Sabahans to send a clear message to the Pakatan Harapan (PH)-led so-called Madani Unity Government (UG), led by the NATO (No Action Talk Only) Anwar Ibrahim, that he must repent and reform or pack-up after the next general election (GE16) due in 2027.

Send Barisan-Umno packing in the by-elections with a message: Enough of political rhetoric, racial and religious bigotry … enough is enough, action only speaks, nothing else.

After Sabahans, especially the Chinese voters, dumped the DAP in the Nov 29 17th Sabah Election, and gave Shafie Apdal’s Warisan 25 seats and the popular vote, it is clear, like the Sarawakians, that they trust a sane and wise Muslim leader than the DAP to lead multi-racial Malaysians and Malaysia.

And Singapore Straits Times has posted a damning report on whether PH, like the DAP, is imploding with political leaders mulling to leave the coalition.

On Jan 24, Sabahans have the opportunity to help consolidate Warisan’s political standing in Sabah and Malaysia.

No News Is Bad News reproduces below a news report on the by-elections:

Kinabatangan, Lamag by-elections on Jan 24

FMT Reporters

The by-elections follow the death of Sabah Umno chief Bung Moktar Radin on Dec 5.

 

Nominations for the by-elections will be held on Jan 10 and early voting on Jan 20.

PETALING JAYA: The by-elections for the Kinabatangan parliamentary seat and Lamag state seat in Sabah will be held on Jan 24 next year, the Election Commission (EC) announced today.

In a press conference at the commission’s headquarters, EC chairman Ramlan Harun said nominations would be held on Jan 10 and early voting on Jan 20.

A total of 48,722 voters, including 196 policemen, are eligible to cast their ballots in the two by-elections.

The by-elections will cost the EC some RM10 million.

They follow the death of Sabah Umno chief Bung Moktar Radin on Dec 5, less than a week after being elected to a second term as Lamag assemblyman.

The 66-year-old defended his state seat with a slim majority of just 153 votes in the Sabah state election last month.

The former Sabah deputy chief minister had also been the Kinabatangan MP for six terms. In the 2022 general election, he retained the parliamentary seat with a solid 4,330-vote majority.

Last week, PAS deputy president Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man said Perikatan Nasional had decided not to contest the Kinabatangan and Lamag by-elections.

Sunday, 4 January 2026

The US goes on a barbaric invade and conquer spree

Share to help stimulate good governance, ensure future of people & M’sia

No News Is Bad News

Update 


 

The US goes on a barbaric invade and conquer spree

KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 5, 2026: The war-loving United States of America (US) is today an international pariah state behaving like the Germans and Japanese during the world wars.

The US is akin to the days of barbarians who love to battle and conquer sovereign states.

And it is led by the obnoxious mentally-challenged Donald Trump.

Trump’s US has started invading and threatening countries like Venezuela, Mexico, Canada and Greenland to name a few.

The barbarian-led US bombed seven countries last year - Venezuela, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Nigeria, Yemen and Somalia.

Why are the rest of the world not reacting against the barbarians?

 

The American barbarians are finally exposed!

 

Are the rest of the world just complicit or just too scared, selfishly minding their own business? What about the United Nations (UN)’ stand on the barbaric invasions and kidnapping of an elected country’s leader?

Is the US above the law and can be free to invade and conquer anywhere it pleases?

The rest of the world better stand up and fight for your democratic rights and sovereignty or wither into oblivion over time!

No News Is Bad News reproduces below news reports on the US supreme barbarian:

 

'Disturbing times': Trump comment has experts asking 'Oh my god how is this real?'

David McAfee

January 4, 2026 9:03AM ET

 

Donald Trump (Gage Skidmore)

Donald Trump made a comment over the weekend that stunned political observers and experts alike, and had some asking, "Is this real?"

The president on Saturday was discussing his administration's successful mission to capture the leader of Venezuela, as well as his wife, when Trump made the remark.

"All the way back it dated to the Monroe Doctrines. And the Monroe Doctrine is a big deal. But we've superseded it by a lot. By a real lot," Trump said. "They now call it the Donroe Document. I don't know. It's Monroe Doctrine. We sort of forgot about it."

Regarding Trump's "Donroe Doctrine" comment, Dem Congresswoman Madeleine Dean said it was revealing.

"He talked about the Monroe Doctrine, tried to call it the Donroe Doctrine. The only reason anybody would talk about the Monroe Doctrine and in some vain moment, call it the Donroe Doctrine, is if you are in an expansionist war," she added, claiming, "The president revealed his hands."

The comment stood out to others online, too.

Chuck Todd, host of the Chuck ToddCast, asked, "Who needs The Onion. Hey kids, let’s talk about the 'Donroe Doctrine.'"

Democratic strategist Michelle Kinney, Co-Founder and Chief Creative Officer of The Seneca Project, a federal Super PAC, also chimed in:

"Oh my god how is this real."

The New Yorker's John Cassidy posted a profane meme asking, "What the f----?"

Professor Christopher Rhodes noted, "I write about the Monroe Doctrine (as well as Manifest Destiny) in my new book and discuss how Trump has seemed to embrace those principles in his new term."

"But now he's not only invoking the Monroe Doctrine but making a literal mockery of it," he further added. "Disturbing times."

Diplomat Tom Malinowski added, "It’s called the Putin doctrine in Europe and the Xi Jinping doctrine in Asia."

Ex-GOP strategist Jeff Timmer also said, "The Donroe Doctrine = Trump is the stupidest motherf------ oaf in this, or any any hemisphere."

How many countries has Trump bombed in 2025?

Venezuela is the latest country to be hit by US strikes as the Trump administration ramps up military interventions.

 

 

A US military helicopter flies over the Panama-flagged Centuries, which was intercepted by the US Coast Guard, days after President Donald Trump announced a 'blockade' on all sanctioned oil tankers entering and leaving Venezuela, east of Barbados in the Caribbean Sea, December 20, 2025 [DHS/Handout via Reuters]

ByShola Lawal

Published On 31 Dec 202531 Dec 2025

This week, United States President Donald Trump confirmed that the US had struck a docking facility in Venezuela, marking the first military action on the South American country’s land since it began targeting Venezuelan shipping in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific in September 2025.

Speaking to reporters as he met in Florida with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump said there had been “an explosion in Venezuela”, at a facility where boats the US believes to be carrying drugs usually “load up”.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 items

· list 1 of 4US claims attack on dock in Venezuela, as missiles also kill two in Pacific

· list 2 of 4Iran warns of ‘severe’ response in wake of Trump’s new strikes threat

· list 3 of 4Trump bombs Venezuelan land for first time: Is war imminent?

· list 4 of 4US says it killed or captured 25 ISIL operatives in Syria over nine days

end of list

“There was a major explosion in the dock area where they load the boats up with drugs,” he said. “They load the boats up with drugs, so we hit all the boats, and now we hit the area. It’s the implementation area. That’s where they implement. And that is no longer around.”

Trump did not reveal more details about the strikes.

Despite modelling himself as the “president of peace” deserving of a Nobel Peace Prize, who – he claims – has ended eight wars around the world this year, Trump’s Venezuela strike was just the latest in a string of his administration’s military attacks around the globe since its inauguration in January.

Armed Conflict Location & Event Data or ACLED, the nonpartisan conflict monitor, told Al Jazeera that the US had carried out – or been a partner to – 622 overseas bombings in all, using drones or aircraft, since January 20, 2025, when Trump took office.

The attacks contrast with his promise to voters to end US involvement in foreign conflicts.

Which countries has the US bombed this year?

The US carried out military attacks against a total of seven countries in 2025.

 

Venezuela and the Caribbean Sea

This week, the US confirmed one strike on a docking facility on Venezuelan territory, as part of the Trump administration’s escalating war on boats it claims are smuggling drugs from the country to the US.

No details about where the strike took place have been released.

Get instant alerts and updates based on your interests. Be the first to know when big stories happen.

Yes, keep me updated

That followed the US Navy’s seizure of two oil tankers off the Venezuelan coast earlier in December, in an apparent attack to choke Maduro’s main economic lifeline. Washington claims the vessels are part of a “shadow fleet” of tankers smuggling sanctioned oil.

Since August, the US has amassed the largest military presence in the Caribbean Sea in decades, causing alarm among governments there. The Trump administration claims this is warranted because the trafficking of drugs to the US constitutes a national emergency, but multiple reports have shown that Venezuela is not a major source of drugs being transported across borders.

On September 2, the US began striking small boats in the Caribbean that it alleges were trafficking drugs. It is thought it has struck more than 30 vessels since then. The Trump administration says the vessels are operated by Venezuelan “terrorist” organisations, including the Tren de Aragua group and the Colombian National Liberation Army. However, it has provided no evidence for this.

At least 95 people have been killed in the boat strikes, Human Rights Watch revealed on December 16, accusing Washington of “extrajudicial killings”.

In early December, US lawmakers from both Republican and Democratic sides urged the Pentagon to release full footage of the first strike on September 2, which has proved even more controversial following revelations that the vessel was subject to a “double tap” attack – two survivors of the first attack clinging to debris in the water following a first strike were killed in a follow-up strike.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has said the footage will not be released.

Caracas accuses the US of using claims of drug trafficking as a cover for seeking a government change in Venezuela. Trump, meanwhile, has called Venezuela a “narco state” and said President Nicolas Maduro’s days “are numbered”.

 

Play Video

1:52

 

US claims attack on dock in Venezuela, as missiles also kill two in Pacific

 

 

Spanish protesters rally near US embassy in Madrid over Venezuela attack

 

Eastern DR Congo violence forces mass refugee exodus into Burundi

 

Taiwan projects calm after China drills, but leaders caution against complacency

 

Trump cannot ‘run’ Venezuela without ruling elite: Analysis

Nigeria

On Christmas Day, the US launched the first of what Trump said would be “powerful and deadly” strikes against groups Washington claims are affiliated with ISIL (ISIS) in Northwest Nigeria’s Sokoto State.

It followed weeks of diplomatic pressure on the Nigerian government, which Trump and senior conservative Republicans, including Ted Cruz, have accused of enabling a “Christian genocide” in a country whose population is a nearly even mix of Christians and Muslims.

Nigeria has been plagued by violence from armed groups linked to al-Qaeda or ISIL, operating in the predominantly Muslim northeast and northwest regions. Abuja denies allegations of genocide and says Muslim and Christian communities alike are affected by the violence.

Furthermore, alleged attacks on Christian farmers in Nigeria have taken place in a completely different part of the country. US Senator Ted Cruz first accused Nigeria’s government of enabling a “massacre” against Christians in October 2025, citing a rising number of attacks against the community in the country’s central Middle Belt region, which is separate from the violence in the north.

Even though these two issues are separate, Abuja, under pressure, agreed to the US military operation in the north of the country on December 25.

Details of that strike are still emerging. The US Africa Command said in a statement that “multiple ISIS terrorists were killed in the ISIS camps”, and Nigeria’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said the strike was “successful”.

It appeared to target the newly emerged “Lakurawa” group, which conflict monitors say is made up of armed fighters from Mali and Niger who may be linked to ISIL or al-Qaeda.

The group is known to operate in forested corridors between Sokoto and Kebbi states. At least one US missile, or debris, hit Jabo town in Sokoto. The Nigerian military, speaking to local media, later confirmed strikes on armed group hideouts in Buani Forest, but did not reveal casualty numbers.

The US and Nigeria have a long history of security collaboration through training and intelligence sharing, but the Christmas strikes marked the first known kinetic US military action in the West African nation.

It was timed, analysts say, to appease Trump’s Christian supporters as Washington doubles down on a narrative of “saving” Nigerian Christians, although Nigerian authorities insist the strikes are not about any one religion.

Trump said more strikes will follow.

Police barricade the scene of a US strike in Jabo, Sokoto State, northwestern Nigeria, December 26, 2025 [Qosim Suleiman/Al Jazeera]

Somalia

The US has long trained Somali forces and conducted air attacks in the region against armed groups, including al-Shabab, a group affiliated with al-Qaeda, which has launched several attacks in Somalia and in neighbouring Kenya. They also target an ISIL offshoot known as ISIS-Somalia.

Al-Shabab, which has about 7,000 fighters, holds large swaths of land in south-central Somalia, while the smaller ISIS-Somalia, which has about 1,500 fighters, is active in the mountainous regions of autonomous Puntland, in northern Somalia. In the past year, 7,289 people have been killed by armed group activity, according to the US-based Africa Center for Strategic Studies.

In his first term as president, Trump withdrew most US troops from the country, but the Biden administration redeployed them in May 2022.

In Trump’s second term, the US has remained active in the country, at Somalia’s urging. Washington has dramatically intensified air attacks since February, according to the New America Foundation.

Overall, at least 111 strikes have been recorded this year, surpassing the number carried out under the George Bush, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden administrations combined, monitors say.

Civilians have been killed in the Somalia attacks. Investigative site Drop Site News revealed in December that at least 11 civilians, seven of them children, were killed in a strike in the Lower Juba region, in Somalia’s southwest, just last month.

The US does not reveal the number of civilian deaths in Somalia.

Syria

US strikes on 70 ISIL-positions in Syria on December 19 were carried out in retaliation for a shooting in Palmyra which killed two US soldiers and a civilian interpreter a week earlier.

Three other Americans and two members of the Syrian security forces were injured in the shooting. No group has claimed responsibility for the attack, but Trump placed the blame on ISIL.

Syria’s Ministry of Interior Affairs later said an individual who targeted the US troops had been a member of the state security service slated for dismissal for hardline views.

The US retaliatory operation, dubbed “Hawkeye” in reference to Iowa, the “Hawkeye State” where both killed soldiers were from, damaged several ISIL weapons storage facilities in locations across Syria, an official told CNN.

“I am hereby announcing that the United States is inflicting very serious retaliation, just as I promised, on the murderous terrorists responsible,” Trump posted on Truth Social on December 19.

“We are striking very strongly against ISIS strongholds in Syria, a place soaked in blood which has many problems, but one that has a bright future if ISIS can be eradicated,” he added, warning against further attacks on US service members.

Hegseth said in a post on X on the same day that the strikes represented a “declaration of vengeance” on ISIL.

US troops have long been stationed in Syria to target ISIL, which once controlled large areas of land across Syria and Iraq in the mid-2010s.

Under the Biden administration, about 900 US troops were stationed in the country until December 2024, when the Pentagon said numbers were temporarily doubled to fight ISIL, amid the collapse of the Bashar al-Assad government. The US has carried out more than 80 operations aimed at neutralising armed operatives in Syria, according to the US military’s Central Command.

At the time, Trump, as the president-elect, warned against US interference. He posted on Truth Social: “Syria is a mess, but is not our friend, & THE UNITED STATES SHOULD HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. THIS IS NOT OUR FIGHT.”

Fewer than 1,000 troops remained in Syria by April, according to the Pentagon.

A satellite image shows trucks positioned near the entrance of the Fordow fuel enrichment facility, near Qom, Iran, June 19, 2025 [Maxar Technologies/Handout via REUTERS]

Iran

Amid short-lived hostilities which broke out between Iran and Israel earlier this year, the US intervened and struck three key nuclear sites in Iran on June 22. Analysts said it was a highly sophisticated mission involving the US Air Force and Navy.

In a televised address, Trump justified the attacks on Iran’s Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow nuclear sites, saying they would curtail the “nuclear threat” posed by Tehran.

The three sites were involved in the production or storage of enriched uranium, which the US claimed had become or was approaching “weapons grade”.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi later confirmed that some of the sites had sustained extensive damage, and the Pentagon estimated the attack set back Iran’s nuclear program by about two years.

Under pressure to respond in a manner that appeared proportionate, Iran struck a US airbase in Qatar the day after the US strikes, in what was likely a symbolic action as no injuries or deaths were reported.

On June 22, Trump declared a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, bringing the 12-day war to an end. More than 1,100 Iranians and 28 Israelis were killed during the open hostilities.

But during his meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu this week, Trump threatened to hit Iran again.

“Now I hear that Iran is trying to build up again, and if they are, we’re going to have to knock them down,” he said, referring to the nuclear programme. “We’ll knock the hell out of them.”

Iran is forbidden from developing nuclear weapons as a signatory to the 1970 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. In 2015, it also signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with Western powers, including the US, agreeing to limit uranium enrichment levels in exchange for sanctions relief.

However, Trump withdrew the US from that pact in 2018 – during his first term as US president – claiming it had been badly negotiated under the Obama administration.

Yemen

Since January 12, 2024, the US has targeted Yemen’s Houthis, an Iran-aligned group that controls much of Yemen’s populous northwest, in a series of air and naval attacks.

The US says strikes were carried out in retaliation for Houthi attacks on Israeli-linked vessels passing through the Red Sea, in solidarity with Gaza.

The strikes escalated to daily attacks in March 2025 under the new Trump administration, under a mission codenamed Operation Rough Rider.

Dozens of people were killed, and the attacks extensively destroyed infrastructure, including ports, airports, radar systems, air defences, ballistic launch sites, and even migrant holding centres in Sanaa and Hodeidah.

The US strikes finally came to an end on May 6, following a truce brokered by Oman.

Casualty counts from both sides differ: The US claims to have killed about 500 Houthis, while Yemen’s Houthi-run Ministry of Health said 123 people, most of them civilians, had been killed by April, following the US escalation.

As many as 247 people, including many women and children, were injured, the ministry said.

Iraq

The US launched air strikes on Iraq’s al-Anbar province on March 13, killing a high-profile ISIL member, according to the US military’s Central Command (CENTCOM).

The group’s second-in-command, Abdallah “Abu Khadijah” Malli Muslih al-Rifai, and another unnamed operative were reported to have been killed in the strikes.

CENTCOM claimed both men were wearing unexploded “suicide vests” and were holding weapons at the time of the strikes. The US also said the strikes were carried out jointly with Iraqi intelligence, and that both sides confirmed the deaths through DNA tests.

In a celebratory post on Truth Social the day after, Trump praised US troops for the action.

“Today, the fugitive leader of ISIS in Iraq was killed,” Trump wrote.

“He was relentlessly hunted down by our intrepid warfighters. His miserable life was terminated, along with another member of ISIS, in coordination with the Iraqi Government and the Kurdish Regional Government. PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH!”

Iraq’s prime minister, in a statement on X, also on March 14, said “Adu Khadija” was known as ISIL’s “deputy caliph” overseeing operations in Iraq and Syria, and that he was “one of the most dangerous terrorists in Iraq and the world”.

The Obama administration previously authorised strikes on ISIL locations in Iraq back in 2014.

US President Donald Trump takes questions from journalists after announcing the US Navy’s new Golden Fleet initiative at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, on December 22, 2025. On December 22, he announced a new class of heavily armed warships that will be named after himself – an honour usually reserved for US leaders who have left office [Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP]

What has Trump said about US military action overseas in the past?

Trump earned widespread support from many Americans tired of the country’s costly involvement in the Middle East when he pledged during the campaign for his first term as president to put “America First” and stop US involvement in foreign conflicts.

In one presidential debate, Trump accused the former Bush administration of failing in its handling of the fallout of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on New York in September 2001, and said “the war in Iraq is a big fat mistake … We spent two trillion dollars, thousands of lives (lost).”

At the start of his second term in January 2025, Trump pledged to restore peace by bringing an end to ongoing global conflicts. His success, he said during his inaugural address, would be judged, “by the battles we win, but also by the wars that we end – and perhaps most importantly, the wars we never get into”.

While Trump has undoubtedly played a role in pausing some conflicts around the world this year, said Sarang Shidore, head of Global South at the US-based Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, his efforts “lack the delicate, sustained, behind-the-scenes diplomacy usually required in global conflicts”.

Furthermore, in South America in particular, Trump appears to be reverting to the old days of the 20th century, when US intervention toppled multiple governments from Brazil to Bolivia.

“Washington’s escalated offensive in Latin America and strikes in Nigeria and Somalia are partly performative acts rooted in domestic drivers of foreign policy,” Shidore said.