Monday 30 September 2024

‘1MDB’ Najib’ admits taking money from Arabs

Share to help stimulate good governance, ensure future of people & M’sia

No News Is Bad News

 Facebook image

‘1MDB’ Najib’ admits taking money from Arabs

KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 1, 2024: Disgraced former prime minister and current jail bird Najib “1MDB” Razak’s lead counsel Shafee Abdullah told the High Court here today that Najib used money donated by Arabs for political purposes.

Is that so?

So, does that make it right or legal? So, is the former Umno president Najib now admitting that he took money from the Arabs for politics?

Also, does anyone in his or her right mind believe that the Arabs would donate such a huge amount of money for zero returns?

And, why is he suddenly on a wheelchair in court? To add weight to his appeal for house arrest (read as backdoor freedom)?

No News Is Bad News reproduces below a news report on the court proceedings:

Najib used ‘Arab donation’ for political purposes, not self, court hears

Ho Kit Yen

-01 Oct 2024, 12:02 PM

Lawyer Shafee Abdullah says Najib Razak’s use of the money to benefit the public goes ‘against the pathology of corruption’.

Najib Razak is charged with 25 counts of money laundering and abuse of power over alleged 1MDB funds amounting to RM2.28 billion deposited into his AmBank accounts between February 2011 and December 2014. (Bernama pic)

KUALA LUMPUR: Former prime minister Najib Razak spent the alleged Arab donation money for political purposes, and not for his personal enjoyment, the High Court heard today.

Defence counsel Shafee Abdullah said it is against the pathology of corruption that a person takes money and spends it for the benefit of the public.

“We have proven that 95% of the money was not spent for his personal (benefit).

He did not buy a private plane or treat everyone with champagne at bars, Shafee said during submissions at the close of the prosecution’s case in Najib’s 1MDB trial.

Asked by Justice Collin Lawrence Sequerah whether he had legal authority to back his contention, Shafee said it is an inference of facts as Najib’s 1MDB case is without precedent.

He said it was a matter for which the court must make a factual finding.

Now, what does the prosecution have to say, Sequerah asked.

Deputy public prosecutor (DPP) Kamal Bahrin Omar told the court the prosecution is only concerned with the fact that the alleged money which entered Najib’s accounts had come from illegal proceeds.

Fellow DPP Ahmad Akram Gharib said whether Najib used the money for political reasons or personal gain was irrelevant, so long as it was used for his advantage.

Najib is charged with 25 counts of money laundering and abuse of power over alleged 1MDB funds amounting to RM2.28 billion deposited into his AmBank accounts between February 2011 and December 2014.

The hearing continues.

Judge questions Najib's counsel on distinction between personal and political spending

Nation

Tuesday, 01 Oct 2024

2:10 PM MYT

KUALA LUMPUR: The trial judge in Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak’s 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) case on Tuesday (Oct) questioned the defence team about the distinction between the former premier’s personal expenses and those for political purposes.

During his submission at the close of the prosecution's case at the High Court, Judge Datuk Collin Lawrence Sequerah posed the question to Najib’s lead counsel, Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah.

Judge Sequerah: (Is there) any difference between spending for political and personal usage?

Muhammad Shafee: We have proved that 99% of the money in his account was not used for his personal purposes. For instance, he didn’t buy a private plane or treat everybody with champagne in a New York bar, or something like that.

"My Lord, I have to use this word; it is against the pathology of corruption that a person took this money and spent it not for personal use but for the benefit of the public,” he contended, adding that Najib had used RM300mil from 1MDB for the 2013 general election.

At this point, Judge Sequerah questioned the veteran counsel about the existence of any case law backing his argument.

In response, Muhammad Shafee said that "it is an inference of facts" and that no case is quite like Najib's 1MDB case, setting it apart from any precedent.

The judge then asked for the prosecution’s comment on the matter. Deputy public prosecutor (DPP) Kamal Bahrin Omar replied that they were only concerned with the fact that the alleged funds, which entered Najib's accounts - came from illegal proceeds.

Fellow DPP Ahmad Akram Gharib added that it did not matter whether Najib used the purported funds for personal or political reasons.

"The law says that it is for his advantage," he said.

Thursday 26 September 2024

In Malaysia, there is one law for one, one for another

Share to help stimulate good governance, ensure future of people & M’sia

No News Is Bad News

 

Malaysia's justice is accurately depicted by the above image

In Malaysia, there is one law for one, one for another

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 27, 2024: Will justice be ever served in high profile cases like the murder of Mongolian French translator Altantuya Shaariibuu, political aide Teoh Beng Hock who was found dead in the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission headquarters in Shah Alam and the missing religious figures?

It sure does not look like justice will ever be served with the police’s blatant disregard for public opinion and appeal for justice!

No News Is Bad News reproduces below a Whatsapp conversation trail that depicts the frustrations and outrage of the injustice perpetrated by the police over the years:

> XXX, in addition to this report, do you have any further details or information regarding Pastor Raymond Koh's disappearance ? Since you are more connected with the media, would appreciate if you could furnish any additional details and do contact me via my Whatsapp or mobile directly. Pastor Raymond is a very close friend of our Senior and Founding Pastor, Daniel Ho, of our DUMC church and also their wives are all very close. After 7 years missing, frankly, the chances of Pastor Raymond being alive is very slim..and I believe his family members and all his Christian fellow associates believe the same fate has fallen on him..Pastor Raymond and his wife had even attended our church services and we are somewhat updated by our Senior Pastor in the event of any new developments..we continue to pray for him nevertheless and for the well-being of his family as well..appreciate your update anytime, thanks bro.

> It's shocking that this is done by rogue cops who took the law into their own hands. Since no action was taken and these rogues are still free to roam, inaction from the higher ups indicate either they condone the action or they were under instructions to carry out the heinous acts from someone high up just like the Altantuya case

> This push on the police has been going on for the past 7 years and nothing has come out of it..same case for Teoh Beng Hock's tragic death. Essentially, the police report to the Home Minister who reports to the PM. The courts are under the jurisdiction of the AG who reports to the PM too. Anwar has vowed to continue the investigation to reveal the truth of what had happened. As said, even if Pastor Raymond Koh is discovered to be dead, I do not believe this news would be shocking to anyone even to his family members, who I believe they do not expect anything more. But it is important that at least they have a CLOSURE to know his fate and what had actually happened and WHY..? Nothing else can break them as they are all very devoted Christians..thanks

An apt message to the cops in Malaysia.

No News Is Bad News reproduces below our previous posting on the issue:

Thursday 14 December 2023

When the truth does not matter to Malaysia's federal governments

 No News Is Bad News

 

For image info, go to https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=PaN16qOaX0k (The mysterious disappearance of Malaysia’s pastors)

When the truth does not matter to Malaysia's federal governments

KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 14, 2023: Since Merdeka (Independence) 1957, Malaysian politics and federal governments (governments are elected once every five years) have shamelessly displayed selective persecution and prosecution..

Sixty-six years after or more than six decades after, the status is still the same - there is absolutely no interest to solve or establish the truth of certain cases nor expose the real culprits behind the cases.

The reasons for such an attitude is only best known to politicians, those in power and the governments, even Anwar Ibrahim’s so-called Madani Unity Government.

No News Is Bad News refers to the following high profile cases:

> TO date, questions still remain unanswered regarding the disappearance of Raymond Koh, Ruth Sitepu and Joshua Hilmy following accusations of the trio attempting to convert Muslims to Christianity in 2017;

> THE murder of Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Anthony Kevin Morais whose body was found cemented in an oil drum in an oil pal estate in Perak in September 2015. He was the DPP in the Attorney-General's Chambers of Malaysia and Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC)On Nov 202017, six people were found guilty of the murder Morais the accused were former Army pathologist Colonel Dr R. Kunaseegaran, 55; R. Dinishwaran, 26; A.K Thinesh Kumar, 25; M. Vishwanath, 28; S. Nimalan 25; and S. Ravi Chandaran;

> THE death of Teoh Beng Hock, then 30, (a Malaysian journalist and political aide to then Selangor DAP’s state execvutive councillor Ean Yong Hian Wah) who was found dead on July 16, 2009 in the Malaysian Anti-Graft Commission office in Shah Alam while in custody;

> THE murder of pregnant Mongolian French translator and model Altantuya Shaariibuu who was shot in the head by police commandos and her body blasted to smithereens with military-grade C4 explosives on Oct 18, 2006;

> THE 1983 murder of Bank Bumiputera Malaysia Berhad officer Jalil Ibrahim in Hong Kong. During the trial of Malaysian Chinese businessman Mak Foon Than alleged that Jalil was murdered by George Tan for the Jalil's  attempt to block a loan to Carrian Group. George Tan Soon-gin is a former Hong Kong businessman known for role and involvement in Carrian.

Pastor Koh was forcibly abducted on Feb 13, 2017 in a military-style operation that took less than 40 seconds. Almost seven years later, he's still missing. His car has never been located.

No News Is Bad News reproduces below a news report on Pastor Koh’s wife breaking down while testifying in court today:

Pastor Koh’s wife breaks down while testifying in court

Susanna Liew says she and her children have been suffering from depression for the past six years.

Ho Kit Yen - 14 Dec 2023, 2:28pm

Susanna Liew, the wife of missing Pastor Raymond Koh, said she filed a suit against the government and police because she wanted justice.

KUALA LUMPUR: The wife of missing pastor Raymond Koh broke down in tears at the High Court when speaking of her family’s struggles since her husband’s disappearance six years ago.

Testifying before the court, Susanna Liew said she filed a lawsuit against the government and the police because she wanted to see justice is served.

Liew said she and her three children have been suffering from depression since Koh’s disappearance.

“It was really sad and disappointing because the police have not been forthcoming about their investigations (into Koh’s disappearance).

“They made my life difficult and kept interrogating me.”

Convinced that Koh is likely dead, Liew said she needed to know what happened to her husband and hoped the “perpetrators” would be brought to justice.

She said her family had not been able to get any closure in the matter despite the passing of six years since the pastor’s disappearance.

“The right of my family members to receive the body of the person who has been ‘forcefully disappeared’ has not been respected and protected,” she said.

In 2020, Liew filed a lawsuit against the police, the IGP and a number of former high-ranking police officers over her husband’s disappearance.

The list includes former inspectors-general of police Khalid Abu Bakar, Fuzi Harun as well as former principal assistant director of the Special Branch’s social extremism division, Awaludin Jadid.

The others named in the lawsuit are former criminal investigation department chief Huzir Mohamed, former Selangor CID chief Fadzil Ahmat, and police officers Supari, Khor Yi Shuen, Hazril Kamis, Shamzaini Daud and Saiful Bahari Abdul Aziz.

Liew is seeking damages over Koh’s disappearance, as well as for the authorities to be held liable for his unlawful abduction and for misfeasance in public office.

No police action since 2011, says wife

Replying to a question by senior federal counsel Nurul Farhana Khalid, Liew said that until today she did not know who issued Koh a death threat prior to his disappearance.

Liew had earlier testified that Koh had in 2011 received two bullets and a note written in red ink. She said the threat came shortly after the Selangor Islamic religious department (Jais) raided a fundraising dinner held at the Damansara Utama Methodist Church on Aug 3, 2011.

Asked by Farhana whether it was possible that the package had been “wrongly sent to your house”, Liew answered in the negative.

She testified that following the raid, 12 Muslims who attended the dinner were asked to appear at Jais’s office.

The authorities did not come again to the church premises for any purpose after that incident, she added.

Questioned on her claim that Awaludin had spoken at two seminars in 2015 and 2016 about the proselytisation of Muslims, Liew said she did not attend the events but relied on media reports for the information.

Farhana told the court that the defendants intend to call Awaludin to testify at the trial.

The hearing continues before judicial commissioner Su Tiang Joo on May 27, 2024.

Pain of not knowing killing us, say families of missing trio

Pastor Raymond Koh was abducted under suspicious circumstances, and Ruth Sitepu and her husband Joshua Hilmy disappeared, several years ago.

Imran Ariff -

Nothing official has been heard about Pastor Raymond Koh, missing since early 2017, and Ruth Sitepu and her husband Joshua Hilmy, who disappeared several months earlier.

PETALING JAYA: When Susanna Liew’s husband left their house that fateful Monday in 2017, she did not know it would be the last time she would see him.

Liew recalled that she was supposed to take some food supplies to a friend that day but had been too busy in the morning to do so, at which point her husband offered to help.

“He always said ‘I love you’ before he went out the door; he always said ‘I love you’ to me or my children, so those were his last words.

“I have not seen or heard from him since.”

Her husband is Raymond Koh, a pastor who was abducted in early 2017 under suspicious circumstances. In 2019, Suhakam (Human Rights Commission of Malaysia) concluded after a public hearing that he was the victim of “enforced disappearance” at the hands of the Special Branch, amid accusations he was attempting to convert Muslims to Christianity.

Liew said she was thrust into a state of panic and shock when he did not return home, made all the worse when she went to the police station to report his disappearance only to be subjected to an interrogation herself.

“It has been a very difficult and challenging four-and-a half years now for our family because of the uncertainty. We have practically no news and no updates from the police or the government on the status of the investigation,” she said.

For the family of Ruth Sitepu and her husband Joshua Hilmy, who disappeared in late 2016, it is much the same story.

“We got the news from my elder brother’s son in Malaysia, Harry Sitepu,” Ruth’s brother Iman explained from his home in Jakarta.

“He was really close to Ruth and Joshua, and he told us the news that he had lost contact with Ruth and that the house was empty. We waited for months thinking maybe they had moved somewhere, to a different country maybe, but Harry was really certain they had gone missing. As time went by, we got more suspicious of their disappearance.”

It was only when they saw videos online detailing Koh’s disappearance that they began to suspect their sister had met a similar fate, although official investigations were ongoing. As in the case of Koh, there were claims the pair might have been involved in converting Muslims.

“As a family, we’re very, very sad. Until now, it isn’t clear where she is. We are also disappointed with the government here in Indonesia,” he said, claiming that it had not given his sister’s disappearance sufficient attention.

Iman and the family believe Ruth and Joshua are still alive, because “we as a family still feel that connection with her, we don’t have that feeling inside that she is dead”.

Liew shares the same hope for her husband Koh, and it is her “hope and dream” that they will one day be reunited.

“My family and I and our friends, some of us have had dreams that he is still alive and as long as we do not see his body we will believe that he is not dead, and I will continue my efforts to speak out and do all I can to get him and the others released.

“Wherever Pastor Raymond is, God is with him, whether he is alive or whether he is martyred, he is a hero to us because he believed in his convictions and he lived it out.”

Beware! Kuala Selangor unleashes naked enforcement officers!

Share to help stimulate good governance, ensure future of people & M’sia

No News Is Bad News

Beware! Kuala Selangor unleashes naked enforcement officers!

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 27, 2024: The above image was shared in social media and the signboard reads:

Awas! Anda akan berhadapan dengan penguatkuasa tidak berpakaian (Beware! You will be confronted by naked enforcement officers).

Is it the council’s new or brainy tactic to employ naked enforcement officers?

The signboard was put up by the Kuala Selangor District Council!

Malunya! (So shameful!)

A government department cannot even master its own national language!

And racial and religious bigots want the English and Chinese languages to be banned in Malaysia when they cannot even master Bahasa Malaysia!

Bombshell: Alleged religiously extremist cops involved in Pastor Koh’s disappearance

Share to help stimulate good governance, ensure future of people & M’sia

No News Is Bad News

Justice denied for them and their loved ones due to religious reasons.

Bombshell: Alleged religiously extremist cops involved in Pastor Koh’s disappearance

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 26, 2024: A police task force report concluded that rogue police officers were involved in the disappearance of Pastor Raymond Koh and activist Amri Che Mat.

The High Court today also heard that the policemen either acted alone or in tandem with religious organisations.

Koh was forcibly disappeared for his religious activity and humanitarian work. Koh was abducted after his car was surrounded by three black SUVs outside Kuala Lumpur.on Feb 13, 2017.

So, why have the police or Government apparently not taken any action against the rogue cops after more than seven years?

 

They have all gone missing due to alleged religiously extremist cops who are apparently still roaming around freely as police had yet to reveal any action taken against the abductors.

 

No News Is Bad News reproduces below a news report on the court proceedings:

‘Rogue’ cops involved in Koh’s disappearance, says task force

Ho Kit Yen

-26 Sep 2024, 06:17 PM

Zamri Yahya says these policemen either acted alone or in tandem with religious organisations.

Pastor Raymond Koh’s wife, Susanna Liew, is suing the police and government over her husband’s disappearance in 2017.

KUALA LUMPUR: A task force set up to probe the disappearance of Pastor Raymond Koh and activist Amri Che Mat concluded that rogue police officers were involved in its operations, the High Court heard.

Reading out the contents of the task force’s classified report, Zamri Yahya said these rogue policemen either acted alone or in tandem with religious organisations.

From my understanding, these officers acted outside of their departmental duties and did not follow rules, the witness, a member of the task force, added.

Zamri was testifying in a lawsuit filed by Koh’s wife, Susanna Liew, against the police and government over the pastor’s disappearance.

Liew wants the authorities to be held liable for his unlawful abduction and for misfeasance in public office.

Zamri also said the report had identified similarities in the cases involving Koh and Amri.

“Both of them were religious activists.

Witnesses also said they saw Amri’s and Koh’s cars being surrounded by three or four vehicles before they were dragged into (one of the) vehicles, he said.

Asked by lawyer Jerald Gomez, representing Koh’s family, what conclusion the task force reached in the two cases, Zamri said both investigations must continue.

The task force recommended that either the police or an independent investigation agency continue probing Amri’s case for kidnapping. But I don’t recall the task force making a recommendation for an RCI (royal commission of inquiry) to be held, he said.

Zamri added the task force also recommended that several police officers involved (in the kidnapping) – Khor Yi Shuen, Azizie Abd Hamid, Shamzaini Daud and Hazril Kamis – be referred to the inspector-general of police for further action.

First time seeing final report, says witness

Meanwhile, Zamri told the court he was away when the task force’s secretariat prepared the report’s final version.

“I signed the report (as a member) before its completion because I was away.

This is the first time I am seeing the final report, he said.

Zamri added that he could not recall whether the task force discussed former Special Branch social extremism division assistant director Awaludin Jadid’s allegedly extremist view against Shias and Christians

Gomez: Did your members conclude about Awaludin’s (alleged) extremist views?

Zamri: Maybe. I wasn’t there when they discussed Awaludin.

The witness also said Shia had never been banned in Malaysia.

To a question by senior federal counsel Nurul Farhana Khalid, appearing for the government, as to whether Zamri saw a video of Awaludin giving a speech claiming Shia (followers) are dangerous:

Zamri: I did not see the video.

Asked by Justice Su Tiang Joo what the government’s stand was on the task force report, Farhana said: 

The task force’s findings were merely recommendations and they are not binding to the court.

But money was spent to set up these task forces, along with the time taken (to complete the work), and in the end they have no legal effect? asked Su.

Farhana said she could not comment on the resources used and time spent on the government’s task forces or inquiries.

The hearing continues on Oct 21.

Gomez said his client will call task force chairman Abd Rahim Uda, member Roger Tan, secretary Russaini Idrus as well as two investigating officers Rus Nizam Mahaya Din and Kanesan Maganathan as witnesses.

Tuesday 24 September 2024

Rottweilers’ owner ordered to pay more than RM200,000 compensation

Share to help stimulate good governance, ensure future of people & M’sia

No News Is Bad News

Is this dog specie worth the risk to keep as a pet?

Rottweilers’ owner ordered to pay more than RM200,000 compensation

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 25, 2024: Dog lovers, take note!

The Seremban Sessions Court yesterday ruled that dog owners are responsible for the actions of their pets, especially the wildly dangerous species.

Judge Surita Budin found Lim Chwee Tin liable and ruled in favour of a 41-year-old mother and her seven-year-old daughter who were injured in an attack by their neighbour's Rottweilers five years ago, reported the New Straits Times.

Surita awarded the mother and daughter more than RM200,000 in damages.

Lim is, however, appealing the judgment in the High Court.

No News Is Bad News reproduces below a news report on the court proceedings:

Malaysia

Rottweiler attack: Mum, daughter awarded over RM200k damages

The court awarded RM95,000 in general damages, RM36,469.60 in special damages, and RM88,000 for loss of income.

Updated 6 hours ago · Published on 24 Sep 2024 6:13PM

The judge said that if there was indeed provocation, then, the mother should have been attacked first. - September 24, 2024

THE Seremban Sessions Court awarded over RM200,000 in damages to a mother and daughter who were injured in an attack by their neighbour's Rottweilers five years ago, reported the New Straits Times.

Judge Surita Budin found Lim Chwee Tin liable and ruled in favour of the 41-year-old mother and her seven-year-old daughter.

The incident happened on April 17, 2019, while the mother and daughter were walking past the defendant's premises.

They were returning home after a stroll at Kepayang Hill when one of the defendant's Rottweilers suddenly attacked the girl.

The dog dragged the girl and her mother was bitten on her left hand when she tried to shield her daughter.

Their screams attracted a neighbour who came to assist, while another Rottweiler bit the mother's left palm as the defendant attempted to pull the dogs away.

According to the NST, Lim, in her defence, claimed the mother had provoked the dogs by holding a wooden stick, causing them to break free from the gate. 

She argued that her dogs were well-trained, vaccinated, and licensed by the Negri Sembilan Veterinary Department since 2018.

The judge said the plaintiffs successfully proved their case on the balance of probabilities, and that the dogs, which were under the custody, control, and ownership of the defendant, caused injury to the plaintiffs. 

In her judgement published on the judiciary department website today, the judge said the defendant knew that Rottweilers had a reputation for aggressive behaviour as supported by the evidence of a dog trainer and veterinary officer.

"Through my research, this species was also dubbed as 'Rottweil Butcher's Dog', and that alone speaks volumes.

"The defendant also admitted that the dogs had previously attacked another neighbour's dog to death outside her premises. She (the defendant) should have learnt from the first incident. 

"The defendant also failed to ensure the fence was secured at all material times," she said. 

The judge said that if there was indeed provocation, then, the mother should have been attacked first.

The court awarded RM95,000 in general damages, RM36,469.60 in special damages, and RM88,000 for loss of income. 

The defendant is appealing to the High Court. - September 24, 2024