Wednesday 6 November 2024

Trump's return is bad news for the rest of the world

Share to help stimulate good governance, ensure future of people & M’sia

No News Is Bad News

How prepared is the rest of the world to face the most obnoxious US president in world history?

Trump's return is bad news for the rest of the world

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YFmVSkZIXg (China’s Secret & Unique New Submarine is So Powerful That US is Shocked)

5,775 views Premiered 17 hours ago #china #chinanews #submarine Picture a submarine moving so swiftly, so silently, that it appears to vanish into the water itself—only to reemerge miles away in mere moments. While this sounds like something out of a movie, this could be a reality very, very soon with how China’s naval developments are going. On the back of the largest navy in the world with the biggest and fastest shipbuilding industry, the dragon is primed and ready to achieve the impossible in the realm of naval warfare. Today’s episode will uncover how some Chinese scientists have found the secret to building the worlds fastest submarines.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDLBbfHrzz8 (Chinese Jet That Downed 9 Typhoons Debuts at Zhuhai Airshow)

 Why Kamala Harris lost? To Malaysians, her name Kamala spelt backwards is Alamak (My God)! So, she is now known as Alamak Habis (My God Finish)!

 Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelenskyy is bad omen for world leaders!

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 7, 2024: The return of the US’ most obnoxious president Donald Trump is certainly bad news for the rest of the world.

Bad news for global political stability and international businesses - especially China!

For the next four years, all are expected to adapt and ride out (if that is possible in an ever growing tension global realty) the Trump-charged war-loving economic bullying of the US - called “America first” - meaning the rest of the world is damned.

“The likelihood of a Republican sweep is quite large and that means more expansionary fiscal policy,” said Kirstine Kundby-Nielsen, FX analyst at Danske Bank.

“A more expansionary fiscal policy and ‘America first’ approach will support US assets, including the dollar,” Kundby-Nielsen added.

The US-dominated media has started its “economic and military bullying” propaganda for the Trump-US.

They have featured the “extremely” good relations between Russian president Vladimir Putin and Trump. 

 

It will not be surprising if Trump uses his relationship with Putin in an attempt to drive a wedge in Russia-China relations for global economic and military control.

It will be a futile attempt as Russia is not expected to dump its Chinese ally which is more trustworthy.

As the rest of the world haplessly and helplessly watch from the sidelines, the US is expected to heap unfair, selfish and ill-intended sanctions and tariffs on those who defy it - and China is Trump and US’ No.1 target as it is fast losing out to China in terms of global economy and hi-technology.

This was Trump’s legacy for the rest of the world in his previous first term as president.

And, scarily, this may degenerate into a situation where the rest of the world may be forced to choose between the US and China, economically and militarily. Not only will this be a global misery, the Americans are expected to suffer more economically in the the long-term.

One thing is almost certain - China is ready (see video clips above) for the war-loving war-waging US. 

 

No News Is Bad News reproduces news reports featuring the pro-Trump and US propaganda:

Under Trump, a unified Congress could push through tax, spending cuts

AFP

-07 Nov 2024, 06:12 AM

Analysis shows that greater leeway to govern could add US$7.5 trillion to the nation’s debt in the next decade.

Donald Trump speaks at the Palm Beach County Convention Center during the election night watch party in Florida. (AP pic)

WASHINGTON: Donald Trump’s Republicans looked set on Wednesday to possibly win control of both chambers of Congress, giving them sweeping powers for the first time in eight years to ram through a broad agenda of tax and spending cuts, energy deregulation and border security controls.

But it would also force them to confront the dilemma of pursuing a Trump policy plan that could undermine the party’s long-proclaimed goal of reining in the government’s US$35 trillion in debt.

Republicans secured a 52-48 US Senate majority and were on track to expand their narrow House of Representatives majority, although 51 of the House of Representatives’ 435 races remained uncalled.

Early priorities are expected to include extending Trump’s 2017 tax cuts, funding the wall along the US-Mexico border, cutting unspent funds allocated by Democrats, eliminating the Department of Education and curbing the powers of agencies including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, according to Republican lawmakers and aides.

The tax cut proposals Trump made on the campaign trail – from extending the 2017 tax cuts to abolishing tax on tips, overtime and Social Security benefits – could add US$7.5 trillion to the nation’s debt over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

The federal deficit ballooned to US$1.833 trillion in fiscal 2024, as interest on the debt exceeded US$1 trillion for the first time.

“We are ready to get to work for the American people,” House Speaker Mike Johnson said in an early morning social media post.

Trump repeatedly proved himself able to steer the party’s agenda during his four years out of power – notably by telling lawmakers to kill a bipartisan immigration bill early this year. Once returned to the Oval Office, his influence within the caucus will only be stronger.

No 2 House Republican Majority Leader Steve Scalise told Reuters that lawmakers have been working with Trump for months to ensure that they can hit the ground running with “a real aggressive, bold, conservative first 100-day agenda.”

He said they aim to recreate the economic growth experienced early in Trump’s first term, before the Covid-19 pandemic struck in 2020 and sent the economy into a steep decline.

Republicans point to buoyant gains in federal tax receipts since 2017 as proof that Trump’s tax cuts raised revenues and say his current agenda will bring more of the same.

“History has shown when you reduce the overall tax burden on families, not only do their paychecks go up, but the amount of money coming into the federal government actually increases,” said Scalise. “As long as you’re controlling spending, that economic growth will actually get you more money to help pay down the deficit.”

But the revenue increase they cite is in nominal receipts driven by inflation and an expanding economy. That turns into a decline when the size of the economy is taken into account.

“The Trump tax cuts really did cut tax revenue, and what the Republicans are pointing to as phenomenal growth in tax receipts doesn’t actually exist,” said Marc Goldwein, CRFB senior policy director.

Legislative hurdles

For the past two years, members of the House Republicans’ unruly and narrow majority have repeatedly gotten in their own way, voting against bills backed by their leaders and leaving them to rely on Democratic support to approve must-pass bills.

Even a more disciplined Republican majority will face barriers, including the Senate rule known as the filibuster, which requires 60 of its 100 members to agree to pass most legislation, a threshold the new Senate will not clear with Republican votes alone.

A workaround, known as “budget reconciliation,” allows the Senate to pass budget-related matters with a simple majority. Republicans used this in the first two years of Trump’s first term, as did Democrats during the first two years of President Joe Biden’s term, when they had control of Congress.

Yet budget reconciliation is a limited power. Measures passed with this maneuver must be at least plausibly linked to revenues and spending.

In late 2021, the Senate’s parliamentarian rejected a bid by Democrats to use reconciliation to grant work permits to millions of immigrants living in the US illegally.

Should the 60-vote filibuster rule block a Trump priority next year, he could call on Senate leaders to do away with it, as he repeatedly pressured them to do early in his first term, and as some Democrats urged early in Biden’s term.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell upheld the filibuster against repeated Trump demands to ditch it during the president-elect’s first term.

McConnell will now step down as leader. While the top two candidates to replace him – John Thune and John Cornyn – have said the rule will stay, they and others who might seek the role have yet to face Trump’s direct pressure.

And McConnell predicted on Wednesday that the filibuster will remain.

“I think the filibuster is very secure,” the Kentucky Republican told reporters

Stocks surge to record highs as Trump returns to presidency

Reuters

-07 Nov 2024, 05:46 AM

Bitcoin breaks above US$75,000, while the dollar posts its biggest one-day gain since September 2022.

The Republican victory sparked a strong rally in ‘Trump trades,’ which led to a sharp rise in US Treasury yields. (AP pic)

NEW YORK: US stocks soared to record highs on Wednesday after Republican Donald Trump won the 2024 US presidential election in a stunning comeback four years after he was voted out of the White House.

The Dow Industrials, S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite all hit record highs with investors expecting lower taxes, deregulation and a US president who is not shy to weigh in on everything from the stock market to the dollar, although fresh tariffs could bring challenges in the form of a higher deficit and inflation.

The Republican’s win powered a rally in so-called “Trump trades,” sending US Treasury yields sharply higher. Bitcoin hit a record high of over US$75,000 and the dollar was on track for its biggest one-day percentage gain since September 2022.

Polls indicated a very tight race, with some concern the process could be drawn out before a victor was declared.

“The fact that we got a clean result, there’s not going to be any messy contesting or court cases or whatever it might have been, is a relief to markets,” said Ross Mayfield, investment strategy analyst at Baird in Louisville, Kentucky.

“So that’s kind of like super-charging the classic Trump trade that we saw in 2016 as well.”

The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 1,450.11 points, or 3.43%, to 43,671.12, the S&P 500 advanced 138.27 points, or 2.39%, to 5,920.87 and the Nasdaq Composite gained 514.26 points, or 2.78%, at 18,953.43.

Both the Dow and S&P 500 were on track for their biggest one-day percentage gains since November 2022, with the Nasdaq poised for its biggest daily climb since August.

Financials, up nearly 6%, were the best performing of the 11 major S&P 500 sectors. Banks, expected to benefit from loosening regulations under Trump, powered the gains, with the S&P 500 bank index  up about 10%, its biggest daily jump in two years.

The small-cap Russell 2000 rallied more than 5% to a three-year high, with the domestically concentrated stocks seen as likely to benefit from easier regulations, lower taxes and less exposure to import tariffs. However, rising Treasury yields could hurt smaller companies, which tend to rely heavily on borrowing and are more sensitive to higher interest rates.

The CBOE Volatility Index, also known as Wall Street’s “Fear Gauge,” dropped more than 4 points to 16.37 after touching a six-week low of 15.44.

The rate-sensitive real estate and utilities sectors were among the day’s few decliners as investors assessed the chances of Trump’s policies boosting inflation and altering the Federal Reserve’s path of interest rates, which has been a key component of Wall Street’s recent rally.

The central bank is widely expected to ease the benchmark interest rate by 25 basis points at its policy-setting meeting ending on Thursday. However, traders have begun to trim bets for a cut in December and the number of reductions expected next year, according to CME’s FedWatch Tool.

Stocks viewed as likely to perform well under a second Trump term also advanced, with Trump Media & Technology Group up about 3% while Tesla leapt about 14% as CEO Elon Musk has supported Trump in his electoral campaign.

Strong gains were also made by shares of cryptocurrency companies, energy firms and prison operators, while renewable energy shares fell.

Markets were also eyeing whether the Republican Party could maintain a majority in the House of Representatives after gaining control of the US Senate, which would lead to less opposition to a Trump agenda.

Low taxes, high tariffs, what a Trump victory means for the US economy

AFP

-06 Nov 2024, 09:26 PM

While they may raise some revenues, they will also hit US businesses and consumers hard, says a Tax Foundation paper.

 

Donald Trump’s victory came as voters expressed dissatisfaction with the cost of living and rising post-pandemic inflation. (AP pic)

WASHINGTON: Donald Trump’s victory in the 2024 US presidential election is likely to usher in a raft of economic changes at home and abroad, touching everything from foreign trade to the independence of the US central bank.

He will reap the benefits of an economy that is in good shape, with strong growth, low unemployment, and inflation that is rapidly approaching the Federal Reserve’s long-term 2% target after years of higher interest rates.

Yet his victory came as voters have expressed dissatisfaction with the cost of living as a result of a post-pandemic surge in inflation that pushed consumer prices up by more than 20%.

While many of the incoming Republican president’s proposals will ultimately live or die in Congress — which controls the purse strings of the world’s largest economy — there is still a significant amount he can do to shape economic policy.

– Tariffs and trade –

On the campaign trail, Trump said he would put in place across-the-board import tariffs of between 10% and 20% in a bid to raise revenues, protect domestic industries, and bring jobs back to the US.

He has also threatened to impose a 60% tariff on Chinese goods and even floated a 200%-plus levy on cars made in Mexico.

“To me ‘tariff’ is a very beautiful word,” he said in a recent Fox News interview. “It’s a word that’s going to make our country rich again.”

Trump “has made no mystery of the fact that he’s deeply enamored with tariffs as a policy tool,” Kimberly Clausing, a nonresident senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE) told AFP yesterday, adding she thought he would put in place large tariffs if elected.

If enacted, these policies will undoubtedly have a significant impact on US and international trade, rerouting the flow of goods and reshaping international economic ties.

However, while they may raise some revenues, they will also hit US businesses and consumers hard, according to a recent paper by the Tax Foundation nonprofit.

If imposed, Trump’s proposed tariff increases would raise taxes on businesses by another US$524 billion annually, shrink GDP by at least 0.8%, and reduce employment by close to 700,000 full-time equivalent jobs, the researchers estimated.

“I think it’s just sort of a very quick way to shoot the US economy in the foot, if not the leg,” said Clausing, a former deputy assistant secretary for Tax Analysis in the US Treasury Department during the Biden Administration.

– Inflation and the Fed –

Alongside his tariff plans, Trump has also indicated that he would like “at least” a say over interest rates — which are currently set by the independent US central bank — and suggested he would look to deport millions of undocumented workers.

Economists at PIIE recently estimated that the combined effect of Trump’s plans for higher tariffs, mass deportation of undocumented workers, and greater control over Fed policy would slash US economic output by between 2.8% and 9.7% in real terms by the end of his term in 2028.

Employment would also be hit, according to PIIE’s analysis, and inflation could reignite, peaking at 9.3% in 2026 in a worst-case scenario — above the four-decade high it reached in 2022.

– Taxes –

The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) estimates that Trump’s economic agenda could increase the national debt by as much as US$15 trillion over a decade — almost twice as much as Kamala Harris’s plans would have done in a worst-case scenario.

A significant chunk of the additional costs come from Trump’s proposals to extend his tax cuts from 2017, which are set to expire next year.

However, extending the Trump tax cuts would rely on Congressional support, where overall control of the House remains uncertain.

Democrats have indicated that there are many parts of these plans they would not want to renew if they win back the House.

“Overall, many of Trump’s policies could end up hurting some of the poorest in society,” Margot Crandall-Hollick, principal research associate at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center told AFP.

“I think a Trump presidency would probably provide pretty limited, if any, benefits for low-income folks,” she said.

“And if you add the tariffs, which are going to increase the cost of goods that everyday people use, it would be a net negative for most low and moderate income folks,” she added.

Dollar set for biggest one-day jump since 2020 as Trump wins White House

Reuters

-06 Nov 2024, 08:44 PM

Bitcoin climbs as much as 8.6% to reach a record US$75,389.

The dollar index=USD – which measures the currency against six major peers – advanced 1.7% to 105.16, a four-month peak. (Freepik pic)

LONDON: The dollar was set for its biggest one-day rise since March 2020 against major peers today and bitcoin jumped to an all-time high after Donald Trump was re-elected president, with the Republicans also winning the Senate and making gains in the House.

The US currency’s climb began after very early indications of a Republican win in Georgia and gains have held throughout the European morning.

The dollar index=USD – which measures the currency against six major peers – advanced 1.7% to 105.16, a four-month peak.

That put it on course for its best day since March 2020.

Trump’s fiscal, tariff and immigration policies are seen as inflationary by analysts, buoying treasury yields and in turn the dollar.

“It has already been a very strong reaction, a sharp increase in the dollar,” said Niels Christensen, chief analyst at Nordea.

“Expectations of looser fiscal policy and a tight labour market point to higher inflation and higher yields.”

The benchmark 10-year US treasury yield US10YT=RR rose 17 basis points to 4.44571%, a four-month high.

The US currency jumped over 3% to 20.8038 Mexican pesos MXN=, a more than two-year high.

It rose as much as 1.3% to 7.1967 yuan in offshore trading CNH=D3 for the first time in almost three months.

The onshore yuan CNY=CFXS finished the domestic session down 0.8% at 7.1649 per dollar, on track for its biggest daily loss since June 2023.

Mexico and China are among the countries that stand to be hardest hit by possible Trump tariffs.

The euro EUR=EBS fell as much as 1.9% to US$1.0702, its lowest since June 28. Sterling GBP=D3 slipped 1.3% to US$1.2873.

The dollar rose to 154.38 yen JPY=EBS, the highest since July 30. It was last at 153.92.

Japan’s chief cabinet secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said today that the government intended to closely watch moves on the foreign exchange market, including speculative moves, with a higher sense of urgency.

Bitcoin climbed as much as 8.6% to reach a record US$75,389.

It was last up around 7.5% at US$74,361. Trump is seen as more actively supportive of cryptocurrencies than Harris.

Republicans also won control of the Senate, and made gains in the House of Representatives as the party battled to retain control there, raising the potential for a so-called “Red Sweep”.

“The likelihood of a Republican sweep is quite large and that means more expansionary fiscal policy,” said Kirstine Kundby-Nielsen, FX analyst at Danske Bank.

“A more expansionary fiscal policy and ‘America first’ approach will support US assets, including the dollar,” Kundby-Nielsen added.

Monday 4 November 2024

Believe it or not! Five years continuous losses but Khazanah and PNB value Fashion Valet at RM300m?

Share to help stimulate good governance, ensure future of people & M’sia

No News Is Bad News

 


Believe it or not! Five years continuous losses but Khazanah and PNB value Fashion Valet at RM300m?

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 5, 2024: Malaysia’s so-called Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) Khazanah Nasional Berhad and Permodalan Nasional Berhad (PNB) valued Fashion Valet Sdn Bhd at RM300 million despite it suffering five years of continuous losses.

And they allegedly gave majority control to Vivy, her husband and father.

Does that make any business sense? Prudent and competent business investment?

No News Is Bad News reproduces below The Coverage  posting on the issues:

News

Khazanah & PNB Valued A 5 Year Continual Loss FashionValet At RM 300 Million Valuation – Both Gave Majority Control To Vivy, Her Husband & Father Majority Control!

5 November, 2024

 

The public pressure was unbearable that the owner of FashionValet (FV), Vivy Yusof and Fadza Annuar officially apologised and resigned from the company.

Off course, they have to resign now that Afzal and his company, NBXT Partner have majority control. Its unlikely of him to keep the never profitable FV team. Otherwise, the member of the BOD of CIMB would be seen as in collusion.

Khazanah too issued a statement and cited the Covid 19 pandemic as the primary reason for the company’s failure.

A member of the Board of Director of FV, former CEO of Air Asia Berhad, and current President of Capital A Berhad, Irene Omar too spoke of the fnancial devastation of the pandemic on businesses including Air Asia.

Frankly she better put her life in order because she will be facing public scrutiny and someone could be facing “life sentence” for trying to cover-up for allegation of squandering public money.

Scoop.my’s Arjuna Mohanakrishnan revealed that FV was a loss making entity before and after Khazanah and PNB invested in the portal. It means Khazanah was misleading the public for directing the blame to Covid and hiding the fact that they overvalued the investment in FV.

The startling revelation is, as extracted below:

In 2018, the year sovereign wealth fund Khazanah and fund management firm PNB invested RM27 million and RM20 million, respectively, into FashionValet, the company recorded losses of RM20.18 million in losses after tax – a steep RM9.4 million increase from the previous year.

Edge wrote: “Separate wheat from chaffe, please“. NST reported the following headline:

Sabah Media’s Wan Azrain revealed that the RM27 million paid by Khazanah represented only 9% of the company,.

It means Khazanah management valued the loss-making (or more precisely never profitable company) at RM300 million. Is that a reasonable valuation?

That was invested in early 2018.

Not only, Khazanah and PNB pumped in RM47 millon for the loss-making company which they described as “promising homegrown e-commerce fashion platform”, both gave majority control to Vivy, Fadza and Vivy’s father, Yusof Perancis majority control!

That’s mind boggling, but do hold on to your fire. That’s not mind blowing enough yet.

Sometime in late 2018, around September, FV bought over 30 Maple, the supplier and owner of the Duck brand of tudung or these days it is more appropriate to be called *ucked-up brand for RM95 million.

Is it possible Vivy and her husband cashed out of their financial commitment to dump the company to FV and get paid handsomely?

So is it fair to accuse they “legally” enriched themselves but at the expense of public money in which Khazanah and PNB allowed it by giving the “anak beranak” (family) control?

Bodoh tak Khazanah and PNB?

So then, is the stupid decision by Khazanah and PNB made consciously by them or it is forced on them?

This leads to the politically video of You-Tuber Aswardy Morni (below). Be reminded that this blog cautioned about playing politics on this issue, however, the buck must stop somewhere.

If it does not stop at the management committee or Board of Directors, it could move up the Ministry and all the way to the Minister, in which Azmin Ali was the then Economic Minister.

The portfolio of government investment agencies were shifted by Mahathir and Daim away from Lim Guan Eng to Azmin!

Now then, why did Irene Omar gallantly defended FV to the point of losing her cool? Other than the fact that she is a member of the Board of Director of FV, why do another Naemah Daim?

This could be guesswork but one connot not notice the similarity of Air Asia with Tony Fernandez as the face of the product and Vivy Yusof as the face of FV.

Meanwhile the financial brain of Kamaruddin Meranun lies in the background of Air Asia. Similarly, the brain of FV was the husband and father who preferred to stay in the background.

Probably Vivy is a woman initiative to create a successful icon of young woman. Nothing wrong there as long it is legitimate and genuinely profitable.

Or perhaps because there is similarity of FV to Air Asia in seeking forgiveness for the reconstituted RM63.5 billion debts and given a 99.5% debt haircut to restructure RM33.7 billion liabilities.

That’s public money in Khazanah and PNB owned banks and listed companies similarly slashed like RM43.7 million investment reduced to a firesale of RM3.1 million.

Tell that to the millions of Malaysian entrepreneurs, who were denied opportunity by someone born with a silver spoon and adjucated bankrupt by banks and government agency for mere droplets of failure.

They would be cussing at all these people getting away scot free after making humongous loss.

Source : Thick Brick Blogspot

FashionValet posted losses 5 straight years before Khazanah, PNB investment

FashionValet Sdn Bhd (FV) in the limelight due to investment losses incurred by Khazanah Nasional Bhd and Permodalan Nasional Bhd (PNB), saw five consecutive years of losses prior to their investment.

A check of financial account filings of the company between 2012 and 2017 showed that its losses widened to RM10.7 million in 2017 from RM166,793 in 2012, prior to Khazanah and PNB’s investment in the company in 2018.

The financial information was obtained from filings with the Companies Commission of Malaysia (SSM).

In the year in which Khazanah and PNB invested in the company, it recorded a net loss of RM20.19 million.

The company’s current liabilities in 2012 exceeded current assets by RM401,248 before it improved in 2017 to  a net asset position of RM1.24 million.

Interestingly between 2015 and 2017, total assets grew almost 300 per cent to RM14.7 million, while total liabilities grew more than 100 per cent to RM11.7 million.

Khazanah and PNB invested RM27 million and RM20 million, respectively, into FV in 2018.

Business Times has reached out to Khazanah and PNB to clarify the innvestment criterias met which had led to their investment in 2018, given FV’s financial track record in 2017.

A Khazanah spokesperson referred Business Times to its previous statement, while PNB is yet to respond.

Previously, Khazanah said that FV was a promising homegrown e-commerce platform when it invested RM27 million for a nine per cent stake in 2018 with more than 400 brands and 15,000 products and expecting revenue growth of about 60 per cent annually.

“Our investment rationale was anchored on the theme of Offline-to-Online e-commerce, as well as a commitment to support Malaysian entrepreneurs and promising early-stage companies,” it said in a statement.

Meanwhile, the Ministry of Finance (MoF) in a written reply to a query published on the parliament website last Monday said PNB’s investment was to support the rapidly growing Bumiputera digital retail company to become a regional retail platform for Malaysian brands.

MoF said the sale of Khazanah and PNB’s interest in FV to NXBT Partners Sdn Bhd represented a responsible exit to a strategic investor who could continue to assist FashionValet in addressing its financing needs holistically and reviving its business in a challenging industry environment.

As of Sept 30, 2024, NXBT Partners Sdn Bhd is FV’s biggest shareholder with 51 per cent, or 2.5 million stakes, followed by Datuk Fadzaruddin Shah Anuar (17.7 per cent) and Vivy Sofinas Yusof (17 per cent).

NXBT Partners is wholly-owned by Afzal Abdul Rahim, the chief executive officer of TIME dotcom Bhd and CIMB Group Holdings Bhd senior independent director.

Its last financial filing with SSM showed that FV posted a net loss of RM34.5 million against RM112.8 million revenue for the financial year ended Dec 31, 2022.

RM47 million investment down the drain?

Well its Business As Usual as some would say. Businesses take off, be successful, take a tumble, go down the drain, might get back up again. Or not! While Khazanah & PNB look at it as Business As Usual, I beg to differ. FV was never a good business proposition to begin with. It’s a fashion platform for premium products? Like seriously? Firstly, who decide they are premium?

Anybody can tell a designer to design a silk tudung cladded with sequin or even diamonds and call it premium. Anybody can do it and call it premium. Do they become premium? No. Made of expensive materials don’t necessarily mean premium. But that’s basically their products, right? Making something expensive even more expensive. That’s their definition of premium. You know what’s premium? Premium takes time to build.

Reputation that takes decades to build. Using names (in this case designers) that are well known for their quality and excellence, and then you use high quality expensive materials to make them. Then yes, then they can become premium. Now who is your designer? VY? Vera Yang? Nope.. its Vivy Yusof. Who???? Exactly So how is FV considered premium? Because they said so?

Whoever approved those investments had no idea about the business in the first place. You think FV stands for what, Fookie Vuitton? And it’s supposedly an online marketplace? Is it? Where? On the internet? Like everyone else???? Why not give the money to everyone else?

They wanted to compete with the likes of Zalora, Lazada? Err ambitious, I give them that. I’d praise them but would I give them even a million? Absolutely not. They never had scalability. That’s the number 1 consideration for business growth. Scalability. Zero. None. Scalability is difficult for premium products because as the country would know it by now after all the T15 hoohaa, we only have 15% of the working force (not the population), that can even afford anything premium. And if that 15% is mostly the non-Malays, how many % will buy your tudung?

And then again, you’re only premium because somebody who is a nobody said its premium. And then somebody somebody sitting on the investment board decided to believe in a nobody who said she’s somebody.

You know what RM47 million can do? That’s 27,647 months worth of minimum wage, a possibillity to take 2303 homeless folks off the streets and putting them to minimum wage employment for a year. And feed their children as well. And you know what 2303 people on minimum wage can create? An industry P/S: You want to know why your ASB/ASN/ASW dividends are low? Because of stupid PNB investments like this.