Dr M’s ‘constitutional garbage’ a national threat to unity

 No News Is Bad News

In focus: Women in Afghanistan one year after the Taliban takeover (https://www.unwomen.org/en/news-stories/in-focus/2022/08/in-focus-women-in-afghanistan-one-year-after-the-taliban-takeover)

Dr M’s ‘constitutional garbage’ a national threat to unity

KUALA LUMPUR, July 4, 2023: Legal experts have reportedly opined that Dr Mahathir Mohamad has  misunderstood the Federal Constitution by claiming that promoting a multi-ethnic country goes against the Constitution.

However, that does not mean Malaysians can just ignore it and not act through the ballots to reject Dr M, the Taliban-like PAS and Perikatan Nasional (PN) in the six state elections next month (August 2023).

They must treat Dr M’s “constitutional garbage” seriously as it is an integral past of his political plan and agenda to win Malay voters, aimed at installing Taliban-like governments led by PAS and PN.

And peace-loving Malaysians who wish to continue living in a peaceful and harmonious multi-racial-multi-religious Malaysia must face political reality and the threat coming from racial and religious bigots from both sides of the political divide, especially from the Opposition.

Malaysians have no choice and must make a wise choice when they drop their ballots into the boxes at every election - for their and to ensure their future.

They have to forget the past and unite against the bigots when they go to cast their ballots.

Remember this: Better the devil you know than the devil you don't.

And whether you voted or did not bother to do so, the elected governments of the day will govern you, whether you like it or not.

So the choice is in your (Malaysians’) hands - allow the Talibanisation of PAS-led governments or a parliamentary democracy to continue to flourish for the future.

No News Is Bad News reproduces below online news portal Free Malaysia’s report on what the legal experts say about Dr M’s “constitutional garbage”:

Dr M’s constitutional claim a travesty, say legal experts

Bastian Pius Vendargon says some principles of parliamentary democracy are not explicitly stated in the constitution.

Tan Chin Tung - 04 Jul 2023, 9:00am

Bastian Pius Vendargon and Philip Koh (right) defended an inclusive interpretation of the constitution against Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s racial approach.

PETALING JAYA: Legal experts say former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad has misunderstood the Federal Constitution by claiming that promoting a multi-ethnic country goes against the constitution.

Constitutional lawyer Bastian Pius Vendargon said Mahathir’s claim was incorrect as Article 8 of the constitution states that all persons are equal before the law and entitled to equal protection.

He also said the constitution does not seek to impose “Malayness” on others or exclude people of different ethnic backgrounds, although it recognised Malay rights and Islam’s special position.

“Just because it doesn’t say anywhere in the Federal Constitution that Malaysia is a multi-ethnic society doesn’t mean it is not,” said Vendargon.

Mahathir has defended his claim, via a Twitter post, against criticism that he was playing with racial sentiments. He said he was only defending the constitution by citing its provisions.

Vendargon said a fundamental principle of parliamentary democracy – that of the separation of powers between the executive, legislature, and the judiciary – was not stated in the constitution.

“If you read it from cover to cover, you will never find it stated there,” he said. “Yet it has repeatedly been said in Federal Court decisions that when you analyse and appreciate the full depth of the Federal Constitution, it is quite clear that the separation of powers is part of Malaysia’s Westminster-modelled constitution,” he told FMT.

He said special privileges did not apply only to the Malays but also to certain other groups of people, namely the Bumiputeras, the natives of Sabah and Sarawak, as well as the aboriginal people in West Malaysia.

“So, if you look at that, you will appreciate that the entire reading of the Federal Constitution and understanding the fabric of the constitution in depth will tell you that Malaysia recognises every one of its citizens and has given them all the various rights.”

Philip Koh, an adjunct professor at Universiti Malaya, described Mahathir’s interpretation of the constitution as a “travesty”.

Koh said the constitution promotes a democracy that is conducive to building a multi-ethnic country, while recognising the role of Islam and the Malay’s rights.

“However, these constitutional recognitions do not negate the fact that, on the whole, the Federal Constitution is meant to protect a liberal democratic (political landscape).

“I’m not saying that valid contestations do not arise in any one instance as to how the constitution is interpreted, but to say that promoting multi-ethnic constitutional order is unconstitutional is a travesty of any interpretive approach (to the constitution).

“The Reid and Cobbold commissions, backdrop of Merdeka and formation of Malaysia, all affirm that we are a liberal democracy and not a race-based autocracy,” he said.

Koh said those espousing a misinterpretation of the constitution could cause unease among the people and be detrimental to the nation’s well-being.