Share to help stimulate good governance, ensure future of people & M’sia
No News Is Bad News
Don’t fear political change for the better with new faces and parties
KUALA LUMPUR, July 7, 2026: When something is rotten, what do you do? Throw it into the garbage dump, right?
Likewise, political garbage, like the racial and religious bigoted politicians and their parties should be dumped into garbage bins.
Led by Alliance/Barisan Nasional (BN)-Umno since Merdeka (Independence) 1957, isn’t it time to dump the political garbage?
Isn’t it enough is enough of the BN-Umno corrupt leaders and politicians who continue to threaten national unity and harmony of multi-racial Malaysians with divisive racial and religious bigotry?
There is a debate on whether Pakatan Harapan (PH) supporters who are disappointed with PH's performance should cast their vote for Bersama as a way of signalling to PH that it needs to improve.
Some believe this is a valid approach that disappointed PH supporters should take. Others caution that such a move will only benefit BN or PN, potentially leading to outcomes such as more pig farms being closed nationwide or even the release of Najib.
This is a half bake political assessment. The voters who switch can come from any party or coalition.
The fear to change by dumping the “political garbage” is why Malaysia is failing in fairness, justice and socio-economic progress since Merdeka.
There can be no change as long as the rakyat (people) continue giving their ballots to the same garbage politicians since Merdeka!
If Sabahans can do it, why not peninsula Malaysians?
No News Is Bad News reproduces below two comments found on Facebook and a post that spread fear of change for a better future:
Already in the 21st century but our malays are still very thick with their racist view and position when other countries already have a black president,chinese leaders and indians pm in europe and other developed countries.Main obstacle in our country is most malays doesnt know english making their world so small and easily manupulated with race and islam
I just do not understand the mentality of some Bumiputeras.
UMNO and BN watched Malaysia become increasingly divided while corruption went unchecked, leading to scandals such as 1MDB, Bank Bumiputra, the National Feedlot Corporation (NFC), Tabung Haji and FELDA. Yet they still enjoy strong support, and Najib is still regarded as a hero by many.
DAP, on the other hand, performed poorly and within about three years was wiped out in Sabah, ending up with zero seats. Non-Malay voters tend to judge based on performance. If you do not perform, you are voted out. Race is generally not the deciding factor.
By contrast, UMNO and its leaders can continue exploiting their supporters while claiming to be defending the Malays and Islam, and they still receive strong support.
I know this will trigger some people, but it is no wonder Singapore is so far ahead. It is a pity that Sarawak and Sabah have been held back by this kind of thinking. If you continue electing self-serving and corrupt leaders, then you deserve the consequences of those choices.
Socio-political Issues (Malaysia)
Therealnehruism ·dtoreSnsopc4m99334llghh941010alll52t6701imml3779632gf3tg9gat ·
OPINION | Should PH Supporters Vote for Bersama?
Currently, there is a debate over whether PH supporters who are disappointed with PH's performance should cast their vote for Bersama as a way of signalling to PH that it needs to improve.
Some believe this is a valid approach that disappointed PH supporters should take. Others caution that such a move will only benefit BN or PN, potentially leading to outcomes such as more pig farms being closed nationwide or even the release of Najib.
That being the case, what should a PH supporter who is disappointed with PH's performance do?
If you ask me, I don't think anyone should vote based on an attempt to anticipate or influence future events.
By now, voters should have wised up to the notion that "the best-laid plans of mice and men often go awry."
This is especially true in politics, where a voter actually has very little control over future events when their participation is limited to casting a single vote once every five years.
If you cast your vote under the presumption it will somehow lead to UEC being recongnised or Najib remaining in jail or pig farms remaining open, you will almost certainly be disappointed with the outcome.
You will almost certainly be disappointed with the outcome, because there is an infinite number of possibilities of what might happen in the future, so you can't predict, much less influence or determine, which is the combination of events that will finally leave you satisfied beforehand.
So rather than vote in an attempt to influence future events, I believe it is far better—and certainly more satisfying—to vote based on two simple considerations: (1) identity and (2) chances of victory.
When you stand in front of the ballot box, ask yourself: Who do you see yourself in? Whose victory will feel like your own victory, and whose defeat will feel like your own defeat?
If there is more than one such candidate, then choose the one you believe has the better chance of winning.
If there is only one such candidate, then vote for that candidate regardless of whether they have any realistic chance of winning.
Do that, and be rest assured that you have given yourself the best possible chance of victory and success, and even if you don't win le succeed, you will still have no regrets.
#PakatanHarapan #PartiBersamaMalaysia #bersama #PRNJohor #therealnehruism
Image credit: Sinar Daily
No comments:
Post a Comment