Share to help stimulate good governance, ensure future of people & M’sia
No News Is Bad News
The uncanny foresight of Malaysia’s First Prime Minister Tunku Abdul Rahamn who sacked Dr M from Umno for his racial and religious rhetoric. - Facebook image
Prof Dr Tajuddin gives Dr M a piece of his mind on who are really the enemies of Malays
KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 23, 2024: Tajuddin Rasdi has come out with his guns blazing ar the racist and former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad (Dr M).
Tajuddin, like a truly multiracial Malaysian, said the Malays had shown themselves to be on par with any other race, and “I am living proof of that, as are many others”
“I agree with Mahathir that, yes, the Malays do have a common enemy. And, their first common enemy is likely the Malay political leaders like Mahathir and many other Umno Baru bigwigs, who often refer to the Malays as a weak race which can only be strong if they stand united,” Tajuddin said.
No News Is Bad News reproduces below Tajuddin’s piece of mind for Dr M published by Free Malaysia Today (FMT) and our past postings:
Who are the true enemies of the Malays, Dr M?
-23 Dec 2024, 07:00 AM
As Dr Mahathir Mohamad says, the Malays do have a common enemy, but we probably won’t agree on who they are.
Many Malaysians were angered and disgusted after a royal commission of inquiry (RCI) report revealed the sordid truth that Dr Mahathir Mohamad had acted unilaterally in giving up Batu Puteh to Singapore.
Mahathir, of course, deflected the issue by saying it was a unanimous and collective decision of the Cabinet, but the RCI report does not support his fairy tale. We Malaysians know what you did in your last premiership, dear Mahathir.
But true to form, even though he is now 99 years old, Mahathir fought back by gathering a force of Malay opposition leaders and declaring that the Malays will soon lose political power unless they deal with their “common enemy”.
Though he did not mention any specifics, I assume he was referring to Anwar Ibrahim and the non-Malays. To add more spice to his dish of good storytelling, he said the proof is that many Malay leaders will be charged in court.
This is a classic Mahathir attack.
In all my years of reading Mahathir, I have found that he does not defend. Instead, he goes on counter attacks. That’s why he is still the undisputed political master of the universe.
The late Raja Petra Kamarudin was right when he said that Mahathir is not only a tactician but also a street-fighter who never stays in a corner.
Mahathir would weave around the boxing ring and throw punch after punch until his enemy wears out or collapses in a daze; hence the usual nonsense of Malays losing political power, having a common enemy and, of course, the threat of Malay disunity.
In this article, I wish to elaborate that I agree with Mahathir that, yes, the Malays do have a common enemy.
Their first common enemy is likely the Malay political leaders like Mahathir and many other Umno Baru bigwigs, who often refer to the Malays as a weak race which can only be strong if they stand united.
For me, this is a tribal model of defence and an animal herding concept. I agree that the Malays were once weak in terms of the economy, education and political understanding, but that is not the case at present.
The Malays have shown themselves to be on par with any other race, and I am living proof of that, as are many others.
The Malay leaders who sell this Malays-are-weak narrative simply want to pool Malay votes to win elections. They have no interest in making the Malays strong.
Why would these Malay leaders do that? Weak Malays are the ones that keep the likes of Umno, PAS and Bersatu in Parliament, perhaps in perpetuity.
The second enemy of the Malays is blind loyalty. The Malays are not encouraged to think outside the box because, in terms of religion, we would be called “sesat” (lost); and, in terms of our ethnicity, we would be called treacherous.
We have leaders like Siti Mastura Muhammad and Razman Zakaria, both of PAS, making false accusations to create the narrative that the DAP and the Malaysian Chinese people are disloyal to the country and are also supporters of communism.
And we have leaders in Umno Baru like Dr Akmal Saleh who always talk in an aggressive, rude and disrespectful manner to the leaders of other races.
And yet these Malay figures have many followers.
Umno youth chief Akmal, not only an Umno racial and religious bigot, seen in this image picking up his daughter in a Chinese primary school. He is truly an enemy of Malays. He wants his daugher to get the best education but not the Malays. - Facebook image posted by No News Is Bad News
The third enemy of the Malays is the blind teaching of religion. Anwar and I are Muslims, but we can see the great value of inclusiveness, humility and compassion across faith and cultures, and possess a critical view of knowledge inherited.
However, the Malays are taught by the likes of muftis and independent clerics who would discourage them to read on their own, think outside their classroom religious education, and simply embrace “taklid”, or belief, without question.
This is the worst enemy of the Malays. This enemy will forever dump the Malays in the pits of undeveloped civilisation. By becoming more and more stupid, the Malays will eventually cease to exist.
Finally, the fourth enemy is corruption. Malays seem to be taught by political leaders and political parties that corruption is okay and even “halal”.
What is the narrative among the Malays concerning corruption? Firstly, Malays think that it is always the fault of the bribe givers, who are mostly non-Malays.
The second narrative posits that when the Malays have a lot of money, then they can help many more Malays, donate to mosques and send the imams or village leaders to perform the umrah.
The Malays also think they deserve the money obtained from corruption because some of them died defending Malaysia, while the non-Malays apparently only reap the fruit of the labour of the Malays. It’s apparently okay that these non-Malays pay their “dues” to the civil service or security force, who are mostly Malays.
So, I agree with Mahathir that the Malays have a common enemy.
The views expressed are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.
This is Dr M’s legacy in the eyes of the rakyat (people). A pariah politician who was soundly rejected by majority of Malay voters. He and all his Pejuang candidates lost their deposits in the last general election. - Facebook image
Saturday, 14 December 2024
Dr M, his cronies and the likes of him are the real threat to Malays
Share to help stimulate good governance, ensure future of people & M’sia
No News Is Bad News
Malaysia’s national pest. - Facebook image
Dr M, his cronies and the likes of him are the real threat to Malays
KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 14, 2024: The Coverage has posted a report titled The Common Enemy Of Malays Are Malay Themselves; Never The Chinese.
The racist Dr Mahathir Mohamad(Dr M) was prime minister for 23 years. If the Malays are weak now, isn’t it because he didn’t establish the groundwork and foundation for them? Why is he blaming the enemy of the Malays (while he did not state so, history suggests he meant the Chinese)?
No News Is Bad News reproduces below the report damning Dr M:
The Common Enemy Of Malays Are Malay Themselves; Never The Chinese
14 December, 2024
1) TDM was Prime Minister for 23 years. If the Malays are weak now, isn’t it because he didn’t establish the groundwork and foundation for them? Why is he blaming the enemy of the Malays (while he did not state so, history suggests he meant the Chinese)?
2) Malays completely dominate all of the state’s important institutions, including the royals, police, armed forces, civil service, and parliament. Since Merdeka, no non-Malay/non-Muslim Prime Minister or Deputy Prime Minister has been appointed. Since Merdeka, the Malays have held an absolute cabinet majority. So, if Malays are losing power, isn’t it because the Malays appointed to all these institutions didn’t perform their part in upholding ketuanan melayu? The Chinese were never near power so how are they a threat? In fact MCA is now unable to win Chinese support because they were seen as the ‘running dog’ of UMNO and unable to promote Chinese interest during your BN/UMNO time. If the most important Chinese party, MCA, cannot promote Chinese interest, then what are you talking about?
3) GLC controls the Malaysian economy and stock exchange. The only area where the Chinese remain dominant is in SMEs; the rest are dominated by GLCs which is a proxy for Malay interests. The NEP and its successors aimed at economic redistribution have created an uneven playing field where Malay businesses are given preferential treatment in terms of government contracts, licenses, and financial assistance. While Chinese businesses have been successful, its despite the institutional barriers. How many Chinese companies are forced to appoint Malay directors? Any Malay companies forced to employ Chinese directors?
4) Malays have privileged access to higher education, their own university, and a variety of other advantages like housing discount. Is this under threat?
5) Ketuanan Melayu is being replaced with Ketuanan Melayu Islam (KMI). There is now a religious layer on top of the ethnic barrier.
6) Chinese population is declining. This is open knowledge. It will reach around 20% soon. It was about 40% at 1957. In other words, the population will be halved in less than a century.
Conclusion: The Chinese in Malaysia are not inherently a threat to Malay political power but are seen as such within a political framework where ethnicity and race are central to power dynamics. The perception of threat often arises from the fear of diluting Malay political and cultural dominance rather than from an actual capability to overthrow or significantly alter the established political order. The real challenge lies in navigating towards a political system where all ethnic groups feel represented and empowered without stoking racial tensions or diminishing the cultural identity of any group, including the Malays. This involves rethinking the political narrative around ethnicity and embracing a more inclusive form of governance.
Source : James Chin X
If the Malays are weak now, isn’t it because he failed to establish the groundwork and foundation for them? Why is he blaming the enemy of the Malays (even if he did not state so, history suggests he meant the Chinese)?
Malays completely dominate all of the state’s important institutions, including the royals, police, armed forces, civil service and the Parliament.
Since Merdeka, no non-Malay/non-Muslim Prime Minister (PM) or Deputy Prime Minister (DPM0 has been appointed.
Since Merdeka, the Malays have held an absolute cabinet majority. So, if Malays are losing power, isn’t it because the Malays appointed to all these institutions did not perform their part in upholding ketuanan Melayu (Malay supremacy)?
How can the Chinese who were never near power be a threat? In fact, MCA is now unable to win Chinese support because they were seen as the ‘running dog’ of UMNO and unable to promote Chinese interest during your BN/UMNO time.
If the most important Chinese party, MCA is unable to promote Chinese interest, then what are you talking about?
‘Muslim Malay supremacy’
Government linked companies (GLCs) control the Malaysian economy and stock exchange. The only area where the Chinese remain dominant is in SMEs (small medium enterprises) while the rest are dominated by GLCs which is a proxy for Malay interests.
The New Economy Policy (NEP) and its successors aimed at economic re-distribution have created an uneven playing field where Malay businesses are given preferential treatment in terms of government contracts, licenses and financial assistance.
While Chinese businesses have been successful, this is despite the institutional barriers. How many Chinese companies are forced to appoint Malay directors? Any Malay companies forced to employ Chinese directors?
Malays have privileged access to higher education, their own university as well as variety of other advantages like housing discount. Is this under threat, too?
As can be observed Ketuanan Melayu is being replaced with Ketuanan Melayu Islam (Muslim Malay supremacy). There is now a religious layer on top of the ethnic barrier.
On the other hand, the Chinese population is declining. This is open knowledge. It will reach around 20% soon. It was about 40% at 1957. In other words, the population will be halved in less than a century.
Never a threat as perceived to
The Chinese in Malaysia are not inherently a threat to Malay political power but are seen as such within a political framework where ethnicity and race are central to power dynamics.
The perception of threat often arises from the fear of diluting Malay political and cultural dominance rather than from an actual capability to overthrow or significantly alter the established political order.
The real challenge lies in navigating towards a political system where all ethnic groups feel represented and empowered without stoking racial tensions or diminishing the cultural identity of any group, including the Malays.
This involves re-thinking the political narrative around ethnicity and embracing a more inclusive form of governance.
Source : Focus
Racism Towards the Chinese Minority in Malaysia
Politics in Malaysia revolves around the conflicts between three major ethnic groups: Malays, Chinese and Indians. Despite this, the country has been remarkably stable since independence from the UK in 1957. The only major racial incident was in 1969 when ethnic riots let to temporary suspension of Parliament and emergency rule. The reason given for the riots was economic disparity between the Malays and Chinese, where the Malay community feared being overwhelmed by Chinese economic power leading to a loss of political power.
To right this “historical wrong”, the New Economic Policy (NEP), an affirmative action programme, was put in place in 1971. It is still ongoing (under a different name) and is regarded as the world’s longest-running social engineering programme. The NEP aimed to increase Malay share of all economic and social spheres via a quota system. The quota was based solely on racial criteria. More unusually, the NEP was for the majority ethnic group, not the minority. The quota was applied to all institutions in the country – from university intake to government procurement and listing requirements on the stock exchange.
The merging of a Malay identity with Islam
The unique thing about ethnicity is the Malay identity was merged with Islam constitutionally. Thus legally, an ethnic Malay is constitutionally a Muslim as well and you cannot legally separate the two.
Article 3(1) of the Malaysian Federal Constitution further states that “Islam is the religion of the Federation; but other religions can be practised safely and peacefully in all parts of the Federation”, leading many to subscribe that Islam is the official religion of Malaysia. Over time, this identity has metamorphosed into the ideology of Ketuanan Melayu Islam (Malay Islamic Supremacy). This is the root cause of racism towards the Chinese (and all non-Malay) community. All Malay/Muslim political parties began to adopt a “Muslim (us) vs non-Muslim (them)” political worldview.
Two main factors were responsible. First, the two main Malay parties, United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) and Islamic Party of Malaysia (PAS), tried to be “more Islamic” than the other to capture the conservative Malay vote.
Second, there was bureaucratisation of Islam. The government created the all-powerful Malaysian Islamic Development Department (JAKIM). JAKIM introduced radical teaching of Islamic theology in all schools, a compulsory subjects for all Muslim students. That teaching espouses a theology derived from the Middle East, particularly Saudi Arabia. The curriculum promotes an exclusivist view of Islam, Islamic supremacist attitudes and rejection of the non-Muslim.
Since the Chinese constitute the largest non-Muslim segment, much of JAKIM’s anti-Muslim worldview were targeted at the Chinese, especially Chinese Christians. JAKIM’s efforts to demonise the non-Muslims in Malaysia as a threat to Islam and Islamic supremacy was aided by the rapid growth of Tahfiz and private Islamic schools from the 1990s. Many of these school teach an even more exclusivist view of Islam and Muslim and sees non-Muslim as dhimmi — a protected minority with restricted rights and who should pay a special tax in exchange for protection. In practice, this meant that the non-Malays would be second-class citizens in an Islamic state.
Many Chinese (and non-Malays) in Malaysia hope that racism towards them will ease over the long run as the demography of Malaysia changes. At independence, the Chinese constituted slightly more than one third of the population but in 2020 they were down to just 23.2 percent.
The thinking is once the Chinese becomes a small minority; the Malay political class can no longer use the Chinese as the bogeyman. This thinking is erroneous.
First, the animosity towards the Chinese is based on a large part on religion – Islam. Second, the Chinese will continue to dominate the private sector, creating resentment. The bottom line is that for the Malaysian Chinese to be treated as equal citizenship they have to convert to Islam and adopt Malay culture and identity.
From affirmative action to racism
The Malaysia case demonstrates how an ideology can set the stage for creating the political institutional setting for racist policies under the guise of affirmative action policies. This is compounded by history – the Chinese were brought into the country during colonial times and were never meant to be permanent residents. Another driver has been the Constitution which defined who is an ethnic Malay and Islam attached to being Malay. The adoption of the NEP after the 1969 racial riots signalled the setting up of nationalised racism across the entire political-social system. Over time this became Ketuanan Melayu Islam as Islam became a political tool to rally the Malays.
The rise of political Islam is part of the wider trend in Muslim countries where Islam is taking on a more political character and plays an increasing role in setting the political agenda. In Malaysia this political Islam comes with an ethnic identity. This conservative, exclusivist worldview of Islam based on Malay identity is supported by the state as a means to rally support amongst Malay Muslims and to dominate the non-Muslims. This construction, by default, promotes racism towards all non-Malays. The Chinese, being the dominant group among the non-Malay population bear the brunt of this racism. This situation is made worse by the NEP affirmative action policy, by giving tangible economic benefits to someone who is defined as Malay. Thus, the Malay identity becomes even more exclusionary as one group, Malay, want to protect their economic benefits. This is done by holding on to political power at the expense of the non-Malays. The “system” thus generates anti-Chinese racism to reinforced identity politics.
This system is unlikely to change for the foreseeable future even as the country modernises. The current ideology has served the Malay elites well for the past five decades. Malaysia’s experience with racism towards its minorities is not unique but it is notable that an ethnic domination has increasingly taken on a religious character. This may be part of a wider pattern across the world and clearly requires examination but that is, beyond the scope of this article.
Source : James
No comments:
Post a Comment