Share to help stimulate good governance, ensure future of people & M’sia
No News Is Bad News
Whacking for Prof Dr Tajuddin and PMX
KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 19, 2025: Socio-political commentator Prof Dr Tajuddin Rasdi and Malaysia’s 10th Prime Minister (PMX) Anwar Ibrahim got whacked by The Coverage.
In the two articles posted by The Coverage, Tajuddin’s so-called “analysis” was labelled as nothing more than a manipulative hatchet job, riddled with twisted logic, selective amnesia, and outright lies, all aimed at baiting (former PKR deputy president) Rafizi Ramli into abandoning the party he helped build from the ground up.
And on PMX and Pakatan Harapan (PH): “What terrifies you (Tajuddin) so much? If you’re truly scared of PH losing power, stop wasting ink targeting Rafizi. Instead, highlight Anwar and PH’s shortcomings and urge them to regain trust. But that would require actual principles, wouldn’t it?”
In short, Anwar is just a manipulative NATO (No Action Talk Only) politician who failed to deliver his promises of reformation to the rakyat dan negara (people and country).
No News Is Bad News reproduce below the two articled posted by The Coverage:
Professor Tajuddin’s Twisted Tirade: Exposing the Lies Targeting Rafizi Ramli
18 December, 2025
In a brazen display of intellectual dishonesty and political bootlicking, Professor Tajuddin has penned a venomous piece in Free Malaysia Today titled “Time for Rafizi to leave PKR and chart own course.”
This so-called “analysis” is nothing more than a manipulative hatchet job, riddled with twisted logic, selective amnesia, and outright lies, all aimed at baiting Rafizi Ramli into abandoning the party he helped build from the ground up. As a supposed academic, Tajuddin should know better than to peddle such drivel, but perhaps his comfy seat in the echo chamber of power has dulled his sense of principle. Let’s dissect this farce point by point and expose the professor for the sycophant he appears to be.
First off, Tajuddin’s core premise is a masterclass in absurdity: If Rafizi is truly a man of principle, action, and strategy, he should quit PKR immediately and start his own party. What kind of convoluted, backwards logic is this? It’s precisely because Rafizi is a man of principle that he should—and will—stay in PKR until Parliament dissolves for the 16th general election.
Dear Professor, have you conveniently forgotten about the Akta Lompat Parti (Anti-Party Hopping Act)? Rafizi won his Pandan constituency mandate from the rakyat under the PKR banner in GE15—he’s not about to betray that trust by jumping ship on your say-so.
You’re not just twisting logic; you’re trying to lure him into becoming the unprincipled opportunist you seem to admire.
And who the hell are you to dictate when he quits? Rafizi rebuilt PKR from the ashes of ground zero, enduring jail time, over 16 court cases, and the brutal Reformasi struggle. Where were you during those dark days, Professor? Hiding behind your desk while he fought tooth and nail?
Without his sacrifices, you wouldn’t be sitting comfortably now, bootlicking PMX (Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim) from your ivory tower.
Tajuddin claims that as a Malaysian, he wants to see the Reformasi spirit carve out a new path, even if it means working with others. That’s rich coming from someone who clearly doesn’t grasp the essence of Reformasi. What sets Rafizi apart from charlatans like you is his unwavering clarity: He knows exactly who to work with and who not to. There are red lines in principle that must never be crossed—no matter how tempting the alliances.
Why on earth are you urging Rafizi to “move on” when he already has?
He resigned his ministerial position of his own volition, a bold move that speaks volumes about his integrity. Unlike the schemers you might favor, he never gathered statutory declarations like Hamzah Zainudin did to topple Muhyiddin, nor did he plot to dethrone Anwar within PKR. Instead, he’s channeling his energy into a new chapter with innovative social enterprises like KESUM and Fleximart. Stop fabricating this narrative of a bitter has-been; it’s you who’s oozing bitterness in every line.
Your portrayal of Nurul Izzah’s victory in the PKR deputy presidency race as a “fair election” is laughable and outright deceptive. Stop lying that Rafizi lost because he didn’t “go to the ground” to schmooze the grassroots.
The truth is far uglier: Rafizi refused to stoop to money politics, dishing out perks, contracts, bribes, and benefits like some of his opponents.
And don’t peddle the fiction that an audit showed no irregularities—Anwar himself shut down any further questioning or auditing. Have you erased from your memory the 20-minute lecture Anwar delivered to Rafizi for daring to challenge the election system?
You’re also lying through your teeth about threats to Rafizi’s supporters; even MACC chief Azam Baki confirmed investigations into a PKR candidate whose home was visited by SPRM officers, and the individual was released without charges.
As for dragging irregularities to the Registrar of Societies (ROS), Rafizi personally didn’t—proving he’s moved on gracefully—but his supporters, led by Faizal Rahman, submitted hundreds of complaints with solid evidence and documentation. Six months later, no reply from PKR to ROS. If the election was so squeaky clean, why the stonewalling? Hundreds of party members even paid RM100 each to lodge reports with PKR’s election committee, only to get zero response to this day.
Who are you trying to fool, Professor Tajuddin? The rakyat aren’t as gullible as you hope.
Bringing this to court? What a naive—or deliberately malicious—suggestion. Rafizi isn’t as foolish as you to risk getting sacked from the party and waiting 3-5 years for a verdict. He could easily rally his supporters to sue, but he hasn’t because he’s not the vindictive bitter man you’re desperately trying to paint him as. Your entire article reeks of personal grudge and projection.
Then there’s your pearl-clutching over Rafizi’s resignation as minister: You were “disappointed and surprised” because he wasn’t asked by the PM to quit. How can someone with “Professor” in their title fail to grasp basic civics? Sacking is the PM’s prerogative, but resignation is a minister’s right—no permission required.
Stop conflating the two to suit your agenda. And your comparison to Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah in Sarawak? Pathetic cherry-picking. That’s an apple-to-oranges farce: One was a clean election; PKR’s was one of the dirtiest internal polls ever, with zero accountability to ROS despite demands.
Why single out Rafizi for attacking a questionable judge appointment when Nurul Izzah protested it too?
And what “sin” did he commit by questioning Malaysia’s unfavorable trade deal with the US?
Your follow-up questions are even stupider: While it’s fine for Rafizi to criticize the government, it could lead to it being voted out—who to blame?
First, his criticisms are constructive, not slanderous drivel like yours. Second, if the government falls, blame Anwar’s weak leadership, flawed policies, and failure to reform—not the whistleblowers holding them accountable. PH and Anwar must own their betrayals of core voters, not scapegoat critics like Rafizi.
You accuse Rafizi of plotting to bring Anwar down, yet contradict yourself by admitting he didn’t escalate election issues to ROS or court. Then you mock him as “not a fighter” for skipping the next party election, sarcastically urging him to “work the ground” and reclaim the top spot—even the presidency—since he’s a “genius, fighter, war general with data.”
Precisely because he’s a strategic war general, he knows when to fight and when to hold back, not charge blindly like your idiotic advice suggests. With a rigged election system, victory is impossible—why waste energy? A true general picks the right battle and timing.
You keep harping on Rafizi quitting PKR now. Why not demand PKR sack him instead? You’re even provoking him to launch Reformasi 2.0 and form a new party. Be patient, Professor—that’s why he’s a victorious general and you’re just a lame-duck scribe hiding behind a screen. When the time is right, don’t regret your provocations.
Reformasi 2.0 could wipe out PKR’s 31 parliamentary and 33 state seats nationwide. Remember, it took Rafizi just three months to campaign and deliver 82 seats to PH, handing Anwar the premiership after near-annihilation in Melaka and Johor.
GE16 is far off; Rafizi isn’t rushing, we’re not rushing—so why are you?
What terrifies you so much? If you’re truly scared of PH losing power, stop wasting ink targeting Rafizi. Instead, highlight Anwar and PH’s shortcomings and urge them to regain trust. But that would require actual principles, wouldn’t it?
Without Rafizi’s past sacrifices and brilliant contributions—delivering federal power to Pakatan Harapan after near-annihilation in state elections—do you honestly think you would have been appointed to the National Unity Advisory Council under the Madani government? This is a stark contrast between you and Rafizi. He resigned his Economy Minister position out of true commitment to Reformasi principles, while you happily accepted your council appointment, all while remaining conveniently deaf and blind to the unfairness and injustice many Malaysians face under the current administration. What kind of “unity advisor” are you, Professor Tajuddin? One who preaches harmony but turns a blind eye to the government’s shortcomings?
Rafizi embodies the integrity Malaysia needs; you, sir, represent the rot we must reject.
Stop the Fear, Prof Tajuddin: We’ve Survived 60 Years of BN and 33 Months of PN – We Don’t Need You to “Scare” Us
18 December, 2025
Tajuddin Rasdi’s recent article in Free Malaysia Today, titled “Get Ready for an Umno-PAS-GPS-GRS Govt,” is just the latest example of reverse psychology and fear-mongering aimed at swinging non-Malay voters back to Pakatan Harapan (PH).
It paints a dystopian picture of a potential Umno-PAS-GPS-GRS coalition as the end of everything we hold dear, implying that without PH, non-Malays will lose it all. But let’s be real: we have nothing to lose because, frankly, we’ve had nothing to begin with in the first place.
This narrative doesn’t hold water anymore, and it’s time to call it out for what it is – a desperate tactic to cling to power without delivering real results.
First, stop acting like our rights are hanging by a thread, protected only by the benevolence of a prime minister, politicians, or any single party.
Our fundamental rights aren’t gifts from PH or anyone else; they’re enshrined in the Federal Constitution. No government can strip them away overnight without facing massive backlash and legal challenges. We’ve lived through over 60 years under Barisan Nasional (BN) and 33 months under Perikatan Nasional (PN), and guess what? We’re still here. Those eras weren’t perfect – far from it – but they weren’t the apocalypse either. This isn’t something new or unprecedented; we’ve navigated similar coalitions before, and life went on.
The idea that a 100% Bumiputera government would lead to Malays turning on non-Malays is not just outdated; it’s insulting. We’re heading into 2026, not 1969. Malaysians of all backgrounds coexist every day – in workplaces, schools, and neighborhoods. No one is plotting mass murder or erasure. In fact, look at the leadership in GPS and GRS: they’re often more multiracial, fair, and inclusive than many current PH figures.
These East Malaysian parties have shown a pragmatic approach to governance that prioritizes harmony over division. Why paint them as villains when they’ve demonstrated a commitment to inclusivity that PH sometimes lacks?
And let’s debunk the myth that PH is the ultimate protector of non-Malays. History proves otherwise.
PH has had its chances, yet we’ve seen broken promises on reforms and a failure to address core issues.
Stop blaming non-Malay voters for being “impatient” about reforms – not all changes require endless time; many just need political will.
How long does it take to avoid reappointing Azam Baki as MACC chief for a fourth time? Or to place the MACC chief’s appointment under parliamentary oversight? Why does it take four years to refund RM20-30 billion in overpaid taxes when other countries manage it in three weeks? What about restoring waivers for first-class PTPTN graduates or abolishing the SST increase for private university students – things that never happened under BN or PN? These aren’t pie-in-the-sky demands; they’re straightforward fixes that could have been done yesterday.
Speaking of blame, enough with scapegoating Rafizi Ramli’s weekly podcasts for the administration’s weaknesses and failures. Is it wrong for him to fight for independence in judicial appointments? To call out corrupt practices by a former PM’s political secretary? To question the ART deal that’s jeopardizing our sovereignty? Or to challenge Azam Baki’s third reappointment? Rafizi is highlighting real issues that PH should be addressing, not deflecting. Blaming him is just a distraction from the government’s own shortcomings.
On the economic front, it is misleading to claim that there will be no more freebies for civil servants and the B40 group. Civil servants just got a RM10 billion salary increment, costing an extra RM10 billion annually – that’s hardly austerity. Cash handouts, which cost RM5-7 billion yearly under BN or PN, have ballooned to RM15 billion under PH. Yet, has this swung civil service support to PH? No. Has it made the B40 grateful and loyal? Not really. These “freebies” aren’t winning hearts; they’re just bloating the budget without fixing systemic problems.
Non-Malays aren’t demanding spots in UiTM either – that’s a strawman argument. We’re questioning why UEC recognition is scapegoated for weakening Bahasa Melayu, while UiTM, the supposed champion of race, language, and religion, teaches all their courses in English. It’s hypocritical. And don’t get me started on the rejected parallel pathway for cardiothoracic specialists. Our healthcare system is short on manpower, heart disease deaths are rising, yet we’re rejecting qualified professionals over race and religion? That’s not protection; it’s stupidity that costs lives. How many more years – and lives – before we prioritize health over politics?
The narrative that Anwar Ibrahim is tirelessly fighting corruption falls flat too. The Auditor-General’s report highlights RM122 billion in annual civil service mismanagement, leakages, and wastage. What’s been done about it? Instead, efforts seem focused on targeting political opponents.
And remember Teoh Beng Hock? We were told finding his murderer was impossible, yet now with the latest case in Malacca, what investigations are underway? Past impossibilities become possible when convenient – so what’s the excuse now?
Finally, the cultural fear-mongering is laughable. Stop warning that PAS in power means no more alcohol or concerts. There were more concerts under BN and PN than during the Madani era. GPS and GRS leaders won’t let PAS ban alcohol outright; they’ve got their own priorities. Heck, there’s even a sexy dance mini-concert in Bachok under PAS in Kelantan. Meanwhile, it was the Madani government that banned Dolla’s video over dress code. Anwar nearly banned alcohol in Chinese school halls for private functions – something BN and PN never did. PAS’s Haim Hilman in Kedah launched an event with all-Mandarin signage, while under Madani, KL Chinese signboards were taken down. Sanusi even allocated RM150,000 to 21 SJK Cina and Tamil schools in poor Kedah – not much, but the symbolism matters. Compare that to Anwar giving RM500 to each Indonesian student in Malaysia. Who’s really looking out for local non-Malays?
And please, stop the tired “If not Anwar, then who?” narrative. It’s just a lazy shield to cover his and PH’s shortcomings – it doesn’t fix anything.
Anwar is not immortal; he won’t be here forever. One day, we’ll all have to live in Malaysia without him, just like we did without previous leaders. This tactic might work if Anwar was truly performing, delivering on promises, and proving himself irreplaceable. Then, maybe we’d worry about losing such a great leader.
But the reality? He’s not markedly better than those before him, so why even ask the question?
Malaysia is full of capable, progressive leaders waiting in the wings: Abang Johari Openg and Awang Tengah from Sarawak’s GPS; Hajiji Noor, Ali Akbar, and Shafie Apdal from Sabah’s ; Rafizi Ramli poised for a stronger future role; Johari Ghani in UMNO; Khairy Jamaluddin on his way back; and the list goes on. Leadership talent isn’t scarce – it’s abundant across parties and regions.
Instead of scaring us with “Without PH, then how?”, start focusing on the real questions: What must Anwar and PH do right now to regain our trust, restore our hope, and earn back our votes?
Deliver the reforms, fix the economy, fight corruption fairly, and prioritise all Malaysians equally.
In the end, stop making it seem like without PH, it’s the end of the world for non-Malays. We’re used to it. With or without politicians, our lives don’t change much – we’ve always practiced “kita jaga kita sendiri.”
If you want our votes, deliver real results and reforms. Drop the rhetoric, excuses, and fear tactics. We don’t need you more than you need us. It’s time for accountability, not manipulation. Non-Malays are smarter than that, and we’re done being scared into submission.
Source : FMT
Time for Rafizi to leave PKR and chart own course
Maybe he can start a Reformasi 2.0 movement, along with like-minded colleagues.
As much as it pains me to say so, Rafizi Ramli is at a major political crossroad, to either stay with PKR or leave to start a new party of his own.
I do not like to think that Rafizi is trying to get himself sacked, because that would never happen.
The most gentlemanly thing he could do is to chart his own path, if he is what he says he is: a man of principle, a man of action and a man of strategies.
As a Malaysian, I want to see the Reformasi spirit carve out a new political path, even if that means working with others.
As long as there is a Pakatan Harapan representative in the government, I believe changes will come. Without a representative from PH, the government will revert to the bad old days of Barisan Nasional under Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Najib Razak and Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.
Why do I think that it is time for Rafizi to move on?
I was sad for him when he first announced that he might lose at the party elections earlier this year to those aligned with PKR president Anwar Ibrahim and his daughter, Nurul Izzah.
But if that is what the delegates want in a fair election, so be it. That is democracy. And if Rafizi was too busy to go to the ground and engage in politicking, then that is too bad.
And while I had found him to be, at one time, an astute politician, he eventually evolved into becoming a whingeing one.
When the PKR election results came out, Rafizi lost not by a little, but a lot. He insisted that there was something wrong with the voting system and also implied that members who had publicly backed him were threatened, although the claim was never verified.
An audit on the election results showed no irregularities, from what I understand; Rafizi didn’t drag the party to the Registrar of Societies or even to court, which brings me to conclude that his claims were just that – claims, made out of bitterness, in all likelihood.
Nevertheless, I still rooted for Rafizi.
When he decided to resign as a minister, I was disappointed and surprised. Why resign when you were not asked by the prime minister to do so?
His reasoning was that as a leader who lost in the party polls, he should resign as a matter of principle. Rafizi later said he had fallen out of Anwar’s favour and therefore his views in Cabinet would not be taken seriously.
Rafizi’s excuse is unacceptable both professionally and politically, when viewed against the case of Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah of Sarawak.
Karim, a state minister, was ousted as a vice-president of Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu, and offered to resign from the state Cabinet. However, he let chief minister Abang Johari Openg (also the PBB president) have the final say. Karim remains in Sarawak’s Cabinet.
Rafizi, once free of ministerial and party posts, did not hold back on criticising the government’s policies and those of Anwar, turning from a man who knew how to put political ammunition to good use into somewhat of a loose cannon and letting fly on issues ranging from the appointment of a new chief judge to Malaysia’s trade deal with the US.
But the issues he had raised fizzled, either because it was mere speculation or an explanation was provided. And in the end, he came off as nothing more than a poor imitation of Hassan Karim (PKR’s outspoken MP for Pasir Gudang).
While it is fine for Rafizi to take the principled and moral high ground and continue criticising the government, it could be detrimental if it leads to the current government being voted out. Should that happen, who should we blame?
Then came the rather ominous remarks about not making a comeback to the party’s leadership.
Why did he say that? Is PKR not a democratic party? Rafizi should be able to work the ground and convince the party members to reelect him back to the top and even to the very top, as president of PKR.
I thought Rafizi was a fighter. I thought he had all the data. I thought Rafizi was a war general. But the Rafizi I see seems intent on bringing Anwar and PKR down. For me Rafizi has already crossed the rubicon and I, like many others, are seeing the Mr Hyde in the Pandan MP.
Which is why I feel the time has come for Rafizi to find an alternate route to the top. Maybe he could start a Reformasi 2.0 movement, along with Hassan Karim and Wong Chen.
After all, he said it himself that there is no place in PKR. So what is he waiting for? Be magnanimous. Instead of being PKR’s thorn in the flesh, leave the party, along with those aligned with you, and form a new party.
The views expressed are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.
No comments:
Post a Comment