Sunday 7 April 2024

When cops treat acts of terrorism as just mischief

Share to help stimulate good governance, ensure future of people & M’sia

No News Is Bad News

 

chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.parlimen.gov.my/images/webuser/TERRORISM%20-THE%20THREAT%20TO%20DEMOCRACY.pdf

When cops treat acts of terrorism as just mischief

KUALA LUMPUR, April 7, 2024: Project Stability and Accountability for Malaysia (Projek Sama) says the series of attacks on KK Mart outlets and the arson in Beruas MP Ngeh Koo Ham’s residence indicate they are not “random acts of mischief by fire” but acts of terrorism.

As such, they said those behind the incidents should be probed under Section 130B of the Penal Code for committing acts of terrorism to advance a political, religious or ideological cause, which read with Section 130C, carries a prison term of seven to 30 years and a fine, if convicted.

Why then are the police just threating the threat to lives, national security and harmony as just acts of mischief?

Fortunately, no one was injured or killed in the attacks? Only the police can explain its illogical classification of public mischief when it is clearly a national security threat.

No News Is Bad News reproduces below a news report on Projek Sama:


Probe attacks on KK Mart, MP’s house for terrorism, cops told

FMT Reporters

-07 Apr 2024, 04:05 PM

Projek Sama says the series of attacks indicate they are not ‘random acts of mischief’, as how the police are treating it currently.

A KK Mart outlet in Bidor, Perak where a petrol bomb was thrown on March 26. (China Press pic)

PETALING JAYA: A reform group has called for the police to investigate those responsible for the petrol bomb attacks on KK Mart outlets and the arson in Beruas MP Ngeh Koo Ham’s residence for terrorism.

Police have said the incidents are being probed under Section 435 of the Penal Code for committing “mischief by fire”, but Project Stability and Accountability for Malaysia (Projek Sama) said the series of attacks indicate they are not “random acts of mischief by fire” but acts of terrorism.

As such, they said those behind the incidents should be probed under Section 130B of the Penal Code for committing acts of terrorism to advance a political, religious or ideological cause, which read with Section 130C, carries a prison term of seven to 30 years and a fine, if convicted.

Projek Sama added that police should also investigate netizens who supported these acts in their online posts under Section 130G of the Penal Code for inciting, promoting or soliciting property for terrorist acts. Offences under this section carry a maximum jail term of 30 years.y

“The conviction of any suspect under Sections 130C and 130G, together with Section 130B of the Penal Code, would send a clear message that there is no ‘selective lawlessness,’ as aptly called out by Tuaran MP Wilfred Madius Tangau,” it said.

“This would immediately deescalate the atmosphere. We are puzzled by the police’s inaction or inability to act.”

In January, a Molotov cocktail was thrown at Ngeh’s home, resulting in fire damage to three vehicles belonging to the Perak DAP leader.

Ngeh was reported to have said that those responsible for the fire might have been incited by others and misled by falsehoods spread by PAS and Bersatu over a statement he made on Dec 28.

His statement sparked controversy by proposing that non-Muslim constitutional experts be appointed to the committee examining conflicts between shariah law and the Federal Constitution.

Three KK Mart outlets in Bidor (Perak), Kuantan (Pahang) and Kuching (Sarawak) were attacked by petrol bombs in the space of one week.

The attacks on KK Mart started following a controversy where a few socks bearing the word “Allah” were discovered for sale at its Bandar Sunway outlet.

In light of this, Projek Sama called for the establishment of a multi-partisan, cross-ministry mechanism aimed at managing, defusing, and preventing ethno-religious tensions.

“A cross-ministry set-up would allow better coordination while a multi-partisan decision-making process would bind all major parties within both the government and the opposition from exploiting any ethno-religious disputes to their advantage,” it said.

The group added that similar councils should also be established at the state level.

No comments:

Post a Comment